Abstract
Flourishing, understood along Aristotelian or quasi-Aristotelian lines as objective eudaimonic well-being, is re-emerging as a paradigm for the ideal aim of education in the 21st century. This paper aims to venture beyond the current accounts and Aristotle’s own, by arguing that both suffer from a kind of ‘flatness’ or ‘disenchantedness’ in failing to pay heed to the satisfaction of certain impulses that have been proven to give fullness to our lives: impulses having to do with awe-inspiring emotional attachments to transpersonal ideals. I thus argue that while Aristotelian flourishing is a necessary place to begin, it is not a sufficient one to conclude, a study of human flourishing, either generally or in classroom contexts; it needs to be extended and ‘enchanted’ in order to do so. That venture does not necessitate an embrace of supernaturalism, however.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 707-720 |
Journal | Oxford Review of Education |
Volume | 42 |
Issue number | 6 |
Early online date | 11 Oct 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2016 |
Keywords
- flourishing
- Aristotle
- education
- enchantment
- supernaturalism