Abstract
Firewalls separate rights provision for undocumented migrants from the border policing of migration authorities. In this article, we compare how firewalls have been negotiated during recent years in Sweden and the UK. Firewalls have been partly strengthened in the UK as a result of the ‘Windrush scandal’. Simultaneously, firewalls have been increasingly contested in Sweden after the 2015 ‘long summer of migration’ as a result of continuously more repressive migration policies. On the basis of this detailed comparison, we argue that firewalls are a useful conceptual lens to understand migrant struggles and the development of migration policies. Moreover, we suggest that firewalls can be a useful resource for social service providers using their discretion to resist repressive migration governing at different levels and scales and for organizing political work by and for people at risk of deportation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 183-196 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Nordic Social Work Research |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 10 Sept 2021 |
Keywords
- Firewalls
- undocumented migration
- border policing
- human rights
- social work