Facilitating (Further) Inhumanity: On the Prospect of Losing Article 3 ECHR, a Vital Guarantee for the Under-Protected

Natasa Mavronicola*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Article 3 of the ECHR encompasses an absolute right not to be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. This right proscribes, and demands protection from, treatment which is antithetical to human dignity. Over the years, what amounts to such treatment – and the obligations flowing therefrom – has been the subject of extensive interpretation by the ECtHR and domestic courts. Applicable in many contexts beyond the conventional scenario of interrogational torture, the right’s significance – and much of the backlash it has attracted – lies chiefly in the protections it demands for persons who fall through the cracks of the political process. This comment contemplates what is at stake, in terms of Article 3’s protections, in a potential UK departure from the ECHR, and concludes that a loss of the protection offered under Article 3 ECHR would facilitate (further) inhumanity, particularly against persons who are already othered, under-protected, and victimised.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Convention on Human Rights Law Review
Early online date19 Feb 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Feb 2024

Keywords

  • Article 3 ECHR
  • torture
  • inhuman or degrading treatment
  • refoulement
  • positive obligations
  • common law constitutional rights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Facilitating (Further) Inhumanity: On the Prospect of Losing Article 3 ECHR, a Vital Guarantee for the Under-Protected'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this