Projects per year
Abstract
International studies show that relative levels of regional (de)centralisation are associated with more or less balanced patterns of economic growth, wellbeing and resilience. Alongside supporting specific levels and types of devolution, prior studies emphasise the quality of local institutions as a key factor underlying balanced growth. This study empirically confirms the relative lack of devolution alongside large and growing disparities across England’s regions. Drawing on an interview-based case study of the West Midlands, we then identify a Catch-22, with devolution predicated on high-quality local institutions caught in a highly centralised system that undermines the development of the required capacity and competency. We identify specific decision-making and resource allocation mechanisms, appraisal and control systems which underpin the dominance of central government agencies in an ad hoc and asymmetric approach to devolution. In combination these limit progress towards locally-driven ‘levelling-up’.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences |
Early online date | 25 Apr 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 25 Apr 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 Academy of Social Sciences.
Keywords
- devolution
- decentralisation
- institutions
- government
- inequality
- economic growth
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- History
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'England's catch-22: institutional limitations to achieving balanced growth through devolution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Local Institutions, Productivity, Sustainability and Inclusivity Trade-offs (LIPSIT)
Hoole, C. (Co-Investigator) & Collinson, S. (Principal Investigator)
Economic & Social Research Council
1/10/19 → 31/10/21
Project: Research Councils