Early-phase clinical trial eligibility and response evaluation criteria for refractory, relapsed, or progressive neuroblastoma: A consensus statement from the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting

Julie R. Park*, Judith G. Villablanca, Barbara Hero, Brian H. Kushner, Keith Wheatley, Klaus H. Beiske, Ruth L. Ladenstein, Sylvain Baruchel, Margaret E. Macy, Lucas Moreno, Nita L. Seibel, Andrew D. Pearson, Katherine K. Matthay, Dominique Valteau-Couanet

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: International standardized criteria for eligibility, evaluable disease sites, and disease response assessment in patients with refractory, progressive, or relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma enrolled in early-phase clinical trials are lacking.

Methods: A National Cancer Institute–sponsored Clinical Trials Planning Meeting was convened to develop an international consensus to refine the tumor site eligibility criteria and evaluation of disease response for early-phase clinical trials in children with high-risk neuroblastoma.

Results: Standardized data collection of patient and disease characteristics (including specified genomic data), eligibility criteria, a definition of evaluable disease, and response evaluations for primary and metastatic sites of disease were developed. Eligibility included two distinct patient groups: progressive disease and refractory disease. The refractory disease group was subdivided into responding persistent disease and stable persistent disease to better capture the clinical heterogeneity of refractory neuroblastoma. Requirements for defining disease evaluable for a response assessment were provided; they included requirements for biopsy to confirm viable neuroblastoma and/or ganglioneuroblastoma in those patients with soft tissue or bone disease not avid for iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine. Standardized evaluations for response components and time intervals for response evaluations were established.

Conclusions: The use of international consensus eligibility, evaluability, and response criteria for early-phase clinical studies will facilitate the collection of comparable data across international trials and promote more rapid identification of effective treatment regimens for high-risk neuroblastoma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3775-3783
Number of pages9
JournalCancer
Volume128
Issue number21
Early online date13 Sept 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was funded by the National Cancer Institute Pediatric and Adolescent Solid Tumor Steering Committee, Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation for Childhood Cancer, the Ben Towne Foundation, the EVAN Foundation, the Cancer Research UK Institute of Cancer Research (Core Award C347/A15403), and the National Institute for Health Research Research Methods Programme/Institute of Cancer Research Biomedical Research Centre.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.

Keywords

  • clinical trial
  • consensus criteria
  • early phase
  • neuroblastoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Early-phase clinical trial eligibility and response evaluation criteria for refractory, relapsed, or progressive neuroblastoma: A consensus statement from the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this