Differences in Sb2Te3 growth by pulsed laser and sputter deposition

Jing Ning*, Jose C. Martinez, Jamo Momand, Heng Zhang, Subodh C. Tiwari, Fuyuki Shimojo, Aiichiro Nakano, Rajiv K. Kalia, Priya Vashishta, Paulo S. Branicio, Bart J. Kooi, Robert E. Simpson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

High quality van der Waals chalcogenides are important for phase change data storage, thermoelectrics, and spintronics. Using a combination of statistical design of experiments and density functional theory, we clarify how out-of-equilibrium van der Waals epitaxial deposition methods can improve the crystal quality of Sb2Te3 films. We compare films grown by radio frequency sputtering and pulsed laser deposition (PLD). The growth factors that influence the crystal quality for each method are different. For PLD grown films a thin amorphous Sb2Te3 seed layer most significantly influences the crystal quality. In contrast, the crystalline quality of films grown by sputtering is rather sensitive to the deposition temperature and less affected by the presence of a seed layer. This difference is somewhat surprising as both methods are out-of-thermal-equilibrium plasma-based methods. Non-adiabatic quantum molecular dynamics simulations show that this difference originates from the density of excited atoms in the plasma. The PLD plasma is more intense and with higher energy than that used in sputtering, and this increases the electronic temperature of the deposited atoms, which concomitantly increases the adatom diffusion lengths in PLD. In contrast, the adatom diffusivity is dominated by the thermal temperature for sputter grown films. These results explain the wide range of Sb2Te3 and superlattice crystal qualities observed in the literature. These results indicate that, contrary to popular belief, plasma-based deposition methods are suitable for growing high quality crystalline chalcogenides.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)811-820
Number of pages10
JournalActa Materialia
Volume200
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors thank Dr. Václav Ocelik for the guidance of t-EBSD measurement. The SUTD research was funded by a Singapore MoE Project “Electric-field induced transitions in chalcogenide monolayers and superlattices”, grant MoE 2017-T2-1-161. The USC research was supported as part of the Computational Materials Science Program funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, under Award Number DE-SC0014607. Ms Jing Ning is grateful for her MoE Ph.D. scholarship. The SUTD authors are grateful for space and facilities provided by the SUTD-MIT International Design Center (IDC). Mr. Heng Zhang acknowledge the financial support from China Scholarship Council (CSC, No. 201706890019).

Funding Information:
The authors thank Dr. V?clav Ocelik for the guidance of t-EBSD measurement. The SUTD research was funded by a Singapore MoE Project ?Electric-field induced transitions in chalcogenide monolayers and superlattices?, grant MoE 2017-T2-1-161. The USC research was supported as part of the Computational Materials Science Program funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, under Award Number DE-SC0014607. Ms Jing Ning is grateful for her MoE Ph.D. scholarship. The SUTD authors are grateful for space and facilities provided by the SUTD-MIT International Design Center (IDC). Mr. Heng Zhang acknowledge the financial support from China Scholarship Council (CSC, No. 201706890019).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Acta Materialia Inc.

Keywords

  • Chalcogenides
  • Epitaxial growth
  • Phase change memory
  • Physical vapour deposition
  • Van der Waals epitaxy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Ceramics and Composites
  • Polymers and Plastics
  • Metals and Alloys

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in Sb2Te3 growth by pulsed laser and sputter deposition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this