Development and initial cohort validation of the Arthritis Research UK Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) for use across musculoskeletal care pathways

Jonathan C Hill, Sujin Kang, Elena Benedetto, Helen Myers, Steven Blackburn, Stephanie Smith, Kate M Dunn, Elaine Hay, Jonathan Rees, David Beard, Sion Glyn-Jones, Karen Barker, Benjamin Ellis, Ray Fitzpatrick, Andrew Price

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Current musculoskeletal outcome tools are fragmented across different healthcare settings and conditions. Our objectives were to develop and validate a single musculoskeletal outcome measure for use throughout the pathway and patients with different musculoskeletal conditions: the Arthritis Research UK Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ).

SETTING: A consensus workshop with stakeholders from across the musculoskeletal community, workshops and individual interviews with a broad mix of musculoskeletal patients identified and prioritised outcomes for MSK-HQ inclusion. Initial psychometric validation was conducted in four cohorts from community physiotherapy, and secondary care orthopaedic hip, knee and shoulder clinics.

PARTICIPANTS: Stakeholders (n=29) included primary care, physiotherapy, orthopaedic and rheumatology patients (n=8); general practitioners, physiotherapists, orthopaedists, rheumatologists and pain specialists (n=7), patient and professional national body representatives (n=10), and researchers (n=4). The four validation cohorts included 570 participants (n=210 physiotherapy, n=150 hip, n=150 knee, n=60 shoulder patients).

OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes included the MSK-HQ's acceptability, feasibility, comprehension, readability and responder burden. The validation cohort outcomes were the MSK-HQ's completion rate, test-retest reliability and convergent validity with reference standards (EQ-5D-5L, Oxford Hip, Knee, Shoulder Scores, and the Keele MSK-PROM).

RESULTS: Musculoskeletal domains prioritised were pain severity, physical function, work interference, social interference, sleep, fatigue, emotional health, physical activity, independence, understanding, confidence to self-manage and overall impact. Patients reported MSK-HQ items to be 'highly relevant' and 'easy to understand'. Completion rates were high (94.2%), with scores normally distributed, and no floor/ceiling effects. Test-retest reliability was excellent, and convergent validity was strong (correlations 0.81-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS: A new musculoskeletal outcome measure has been developed through a coproduction process with patients to capture prioritised outcomes for use throughout the pathway and with different musculoskeletal conditions. Four validation cohorts found that the MSK-HQ had high completion rates, excellent test-retest reliability and strong convergent validity with reference standards. Further validation studies are ongoing, including a cohort with rheumatoid/inflammatory arthritis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e012331
JournalBMJ open
Volume6
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Aug 2016

Bibliographical note

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cohort Studies
  • Consensus
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Musculoskeletal Diseases/physiopathology
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care/standards
  • Pain Management
  • Physical Therapy Modalities
  • Psychometrics/methods
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Surveys and Questionnaires/standards
  • United Kingdom

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development and initial cohort validation of the Arthritis Research UK Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) for use across musculoskeletal care pathways'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this