Criminal responsibility (insanity defence) in Hong Kong

Samuel Adjorlolo, Choon (Oliver) CHAN Heng

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the concept of mental illness and criminal responsibility and provides the origin of the insanity defence law. It highlights the insanity defence, including its essential elements, the special verdict, and the disposition of insanity acquittees. The insanity defence may be raised by a defendant who supposedly suffered from a mental abnormality at the time of committing the alleged offence. Defect of reason can be proven on the ground that the defendant's power of reasoning, as well as his or her ability to make rational choices and decisions, is severely compromised. The defect of reason must arise from a disease of the mind. The criminal law in Hong Kong, just like in Britain, provides a rebuttal of the presumption of sanity. One central feature of both English and Hong Kong legislation is the presumption that every man is sane and should be held accordingly for performing any act that contravenes the law.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPsycho-Criminological Perspective of Criminal Justice in Asia
Subtitle of host publicationResearch and Practices in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Beyond
EditorsHeng Choon (Oliver) Chan, Samuel Ho
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter3
Pages46-60
Number of pages15
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781315564036
ISBN (Print)9781138680654, 9781138365872
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Mar 2017

Publication series

NameRoutledge Studies in Asian Behavioural Sciences
PublisherRoutledge

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Criminal responsibility (insanity defence) in Hong Kong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this