In the Results section of the published paper of Rigato et al. (2013) [Eur. J. Neurosci. 38 2884-2892], under the heading ‘Comparing the lateralization of posture effects across experiments’ (pp. 2889–2890), there was an error in the reporting of the Monte Carlo simulation. The simulation was performed between 128 and 200 ms (and not between 0 and 200 ms), and the significant effect started at 168 ms, and not at 152 ms as printed. The authors regret this error. The following is the correct reporting of this analysis: The Monte Carlo simulation was performed between 128 and 200 ms and the significant effect of sight of the limbs (the variable manipulated between the two experiments) on the laterality of postural remapping started at 168 ms, and was observed until the end of the interval tested, i.e., 200 ms (a sequence of consecutive significant t-tests, all P < 0.05, over 18 ms in length was deemed significant). The mean first-order autocorrelation at lag 1 was 0.96.
ASJC Scopus subject areas