Comparison of anticipated and actual control group outcome in randomised trials in paediatric oncology provides evidence that non-randomised studies are biased in favour of the novel treatment.

Veronica Moroz; Jayne Wilson; Keith Wheatley

doi:10.1186/1745-6215-12-S1-A108

Comparison of anticipated and actual control group outcome in randomised trials in paediatric oncology provides evidence that non-randomised studies are biased in favour of the novel treatment.

Veronica Moroz, Jayne Wilson, Keith Wheatley

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	A108
Journal	Trials
Volume	12 Suppl 1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-S1-A108
Publication status	Published - 13 Dec 2011

Access to Document

10.1186/1745-6215-12-S1-A108

Cite this

@article{c43f7874afbb4d21a45bb625644f9935,

title = "Comparison of anticipated and actual control group outcome in randomised trials in paediatric oncology provides evidence that non-randomised studies are biased in favour of the novel treatment.",

author = "Veronica Moroz and Jayne Wilson and Keith Wheatley",

year = "2011",

month = dec,

day = "13",

doi = "10.1186/1745-6215-12-S1-A108",

language = "English",

volume = "12 Suppl 1",

pages = "A108",

journal = "Trials",

publisher = "Springer",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of anticipated and actual control group outcome in randomised trials in paediatric oncology provides evidence that non-randomised studies are biased in favour of the novel treatment.

AU - Moroz, Veronica

AU - Wilson, Jayne

AU - Wheatley, Keith

PY - 2011/12/13

Y1 - 2011/12/13

U2 - 10.1186/1745-6215-12-S1-A108

DO - 10.1186/1745-6215-12-S1-A108

M3 - Article

C2 - 22376496

VL - 12 Suppl 1

SP - A108

JO - Trials

JF - Trials

ER -