Cognitive Remediation in Bipolar (CRiB2): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial assessing efficacy and mechanisms of cognitive remediation therapy compared to treatment as usual

Dimosthenis Tsapekos*, Rebecca Strawbridge, Matteo Cella, Kimberley Goldsmith, Michail Kalfas, Rosie H. Taylor, Samuel Swidzinski, Steven Marwaha, Libby Grey, Elizabeth Newton, Julie Shackleton, Paul J. Harrison, Michael Browning, Catherine Harmer, Hannah Hartland, David Cousins, Stephen Barton, Til Wykes, Allan H Young

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: A substantial proportion of people with bipolar disorder (BD) experience persistent cognitive difficulties associated with impairments in psychosocial functioning and a poorer disorder course. Emerging evidence suggests that cognitive remediation (CR), a psychological intervention with established efficacy in people with schizophrenia, can also benefit people with BD. Following a proof-of-concept trial showing that CR is feasible and potentially beneficial for people with BD, we are conducting an adequately powered trial in euthymic people with BD to 1) determine whether an individual, therapist-supported, computerised CR can reduce cognitive difficulties and improve functional outcomes; and 2) explore how CR exerts its effects. Methods: CRiB2 is a two-arm, assessor-blind, multi-site, randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing CR to treatment-as-usual (TAU). Participants are people with a diagnosis of BD, aged between 18 and 65, with no neurological or current substance use disorder, and currently euthymic. 250 participants will be recruited through primary, secondary, tertiary care, and the community. Participants will be block-randomised (1:1 ratio, stratified by site) to continue with their usual care (TAU) or receive a 12-week course of therapy and usual care (CR + TAU). The intervention comprises one-on-one CR sessions with a therapist supplemented with independent cognitive training for 30–40 h in total. Outcomes will be assessed at 13- and 25-weeks post-randomisation. Efficacy will be examined by intention-to-treat analyses estimating between-group differences in primary (i.e., psychosocial functioning at week 25 measured with the Functional Assessment Short Test) and secondary outcomes (i.e., measures of cognition, mood, patient-defined goals, and quality of life). Global cognition, metacognitive skills, affect fluctuation, and salivary cortisol levels will be evaluated as putative mechanisms of CR through mediation models. Discussion: This study will provide a robust evaluation of efficacy of CR in people with BD and examine the putative mechanisms by which this therapy works. The findings will contribute to determining the clinical utility of CR and potential mechanisms of action. Trial registration: Cognitive Remediation in Bipolar 2 (CRiB2): ISRCTN registry: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10362331. Registered 04 May 2022. Overall trial status: Ongoing; Recruitment status: Recruiting.
Original languageEnglish
Article number842
Number of pages14
JournalBMC Psychiatry
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Nov 2023

Bibliographical note

The CRiB2 study is funded by the NIHR (EME Project: NIHR132619) and has undergone full external peer review by NIHR as part of the grant application process. However, the CRiB2 study is an investigator-initiated trial with King’s College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust as joint study sponsors. Therefore, the NIHR has had and will have no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Keywords

  • Trial protocol
  • Mechanisms
  • Efficacy
  • Cognitive remediation (CR)
  • Bipolar disorder (BD)
  • Randomised controlled trial (RCT)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive Remediation in Bipolar (CRiB2): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial assessing efficacy and mechanisms of cognitive remediation therapy compared to treatment as usual'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this