Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Sian Taylor-Phillips, Matthew G Wallis, Helen Parsons, Janet Dunn, Nigel Stallard, Helen Campbell, Sarah Sellars, Ala Szczepura, Simon Gates, Aileen Clarke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
45 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: X-ray mammography remains the predominant test for screening for breast cancer, with the aim of reducing breast cancer mortality. In the English NHS Breast Screening Programme each woman's mammograms are examined separately by two expert readers. The two readers read each batch in the same order and each indicates if there should be recall for further tests. This is a highly skilled, pressurised, repetitive and frequently intellectually unchallenging activity where readers examine one or more batches of 30-50 women's mammograms in each session. A vigilance decrement or performance decrease over time has been observed in similar repetitive visual tasks such as radar operation.

METHODS/DESIGN: The CO-OPS study is a pragmatic, multi-centre, two-arm, double blind cluster randomised controlled trial of a computer software intervention designed to reduce the effects of a vigilance decrement in breast cancer screening. The unit of randomisation is the batch. Intervention batches will be examined in the opposite order by the two readers (one forwards, one backwards). Control batches will be read in the same order as one another, as is current standard practice. The hypothesis is that cancer detection rates will be higher in the intervention group because each readers' peak performance will occur when examining different women's mammograms. The trial will take place in 44 English breast screening centres for 1 year and 4 months. The primary outcome is cancer detection rate, which will be extracted from computer records after 1 year of the trial. The secondary outcomes include rate of disagreement between readers (a more statistically powerful surrogate for cancer detection rate), recall rate, positive predictive value, and interval cancer rate (cancers found between screening rounds which will be measured three years after the end of the trial).

DISCUSSION: This is the first trial of an intervention to ameliorate a vigilance decrement in breast cancer screening.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN46603370 (submitted: 24 October 2012, date of registration: 26 March 2013).

Original languageEnglish
Article number17
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalTrials
Volume15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jan 2014

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Clinical Competence
  • Clinical Protocols
  • Double-Blind Method
  • England
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Mammography
  • Mass Screening
  • Observer Variation
  • Pattern Recognition, Visual
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Research Design
  • Task Performance and Analysis
  • Journal Article
  • Multicenter Study
  • Pragmatic Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Breast cancer
  • Fatigue
  • Observer performance
  • Screening
  • Vigilance decrement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this