Cellular mechanisms by which adenosine induces vasodilatation in rat skeletal muscle: Significance for systemic hypoxia

Philip T. Bryan, Janice M. Marshall*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

1. In anaesthetized rats, we recorded arterial blood pressure (ABP), heart rate (HR), femoral blood flow (FBF) and femoral vascular conductance (FVC). We tested the effects of the nitric oxide (NO) synthesis inhibitor L-NAME (nitro-L-arginine methyl ester), or the ATP-sensitive K+ (K(ATP)) channel inhibitor glibenclamide, on responses evoked by systemic hypoxia (breathing 8% O2 for 5 min) or I.A. infusion for 5 min of adenosine, the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP), the adenosine A1 receptor agonist CCPA (2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyl-adenosine) or the adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist CGS 21680 (2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)-phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine hydrochloride). 2. L-NAME (10 mg kg-1 I.V.) greatly reduced the increase in FVC induced by hypoxia or adenosine, as we have shown before, but had no effect on the increase in FVC evoked by SNP. In addition, L-NAME abolished the increase in FVC evoked by CCPA and greatly reduced that evoked by CGS 21680. These results substantiate the view that muscle vasodilatation induced by systemic hypoxia and infused adenosine are largely NO dependent. They also indicate that muscle dilation induced by A1 receptor stimulation is entirely NO dependent while that induced by A(2A) receptors is largely NO dependent; dilation may also be induced by direct stimulation of A(2A) receptors on the vascular smooth muscle. 3. Glibenclamide (10 or 20 mg kg-1 I.V.) reduced the increase in FVC induced by hypoxia, preferentially affecting the early part (< 1 min). In addition, glibenclamide greatly reduced the increase in FVC induced by adenosine, but it had no effect on that evoked by SNP. Further, glibenclamide abolished the increase in FVC evoked by CCPA and greatly reduced that evoked by CGS 21680. These results substantiate the view that hypoxia-induced muscle vasodilatation is initiated by K(ATP) channel opening. They also indicate that NO does not induce muscle vasodilation by opening K(ATP) channels on the vascular smooth muscle, but indicate that the dilatation induced by adenosine and by A(2A) receptor stimulation is largely dependent on K(ATP) channel opening, while that induced by A1 receptor stimulation is wholly dependent on K(ATP) channel opening. 4. These results, together with previous evidence that hypoxia-induced vasodilatation in skeletal muscle is largely mediated by adenosine acting on A1 receptors, lead us to propose that adenosine is released from endothelium during systemic hypoxia and acts on endothelial A1 receptors to open K(ATP) channels on the endothelial cells and cause synthesis of NO, which then acts on the vascular smooth muscle to cause dilatation. During severe systemic hypoxia we propose that adenosine may also act on A(2A) receptors on the endothelium to cause dilatation by a similar process and may act on A(2A) receptors on the vascular smooth muscle to cause dilatation by opening K(ATP) channels.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-175
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Physiology
Volume514
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1999

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cellular mechanisms by which adenosine induces vasodilatation in rat skeletal muscle: Significance for systemic hypoxia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this