Bridging neurodiversity and open scholarship: how shared values can guide best practices for research integrity, social justice, and principled education

Mahmoud Medhat Elsherif, Sara Lil Middleton, Jenny Mai Phan, Flavio Azevedo, Bethan Joan Iley, Magdalena Grose-Hodge, Samantha Lily Tyler, Steven K. Kapp, Amélie Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Desiree Grafton-Clarke, Siu Kit Yeung, John J Shaw, Helena Hartmann, Marie Dokovova

Research output: Working paper/PreprintPreprint

Abstract

Not all people conform to what is socially construed as the norm and divergences should be expected. Neurodiversity is fundamental to the understanding of human behaviour and cognition. However, neurodivergent individuals are often stigmatised, devalued, and objectified. This position statement presents the perspectives of neurodivergent authors, the majority of whom have personal lived experiences of neurodivergence(s), and discusses how research and academia can and should be improved in terms of research integrity, inclusivity and diversity. The authors describe future directions that relate to lived experience and systematic barriers, disclosure, directions on prevalence, stigma, intersection of neurodiversity and open scholarship, and provide recommendations that can lead to personal and systematic changes to improve acceptance of neurodivergent individuals’ lived experiences within academia.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherMetaArXiv
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jun 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bridging neurodiversity and open scholarship: how shared values can guide best practices for research integrity, social justice, and principled education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this