Authors' reply to Sabour and Ghajari “Clinical prediction models to predict the risk of multiple binary outcomes: Methodological issues”

Glen P. Martin^*, M. Sperrin, K.I.E. Snell, I. Buchan, R.D. Riley

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Access to Document

@article{91f05aeb74504cd1937303e99bd0938b,

title = "Authors' reply to Sabour and Ghajari “Clinical prediction models to predict the risk of multiple binary outcomes: Methodological issues”",

author = "Martin, {Glen P.} and M. Sperrin and K.I.E. Snell and I. Buchan and R.D. Riley",

year = "2021",

month = mar,

day = "30",

doi = "10.1002/sim.8872",

language = "English",

volume = "40",

pages = "1861--1862",

journal = "Statistics in Medicine",

issn = "0277-6715",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Authors' reply to Sabour and Ghajari “Clinical prediction models to predict the risk of multiple binary outcomes: Methodological issues”

AU - Martin, Glen P.

AU - Sperrin, M.

AU - Snell, K.I.E.

AU - Buchan, I.

AU - Riley, R.D.

PY - 2021/3/30

Y1 - 2021/3/30

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85102173282&partnerID=MN8TOARS

U2 - 10.1002/sim.8872

DO - 10.1002/sim.8872

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 0277-6715

VL - 40

SP - 1861

EP - 1862

JO - Statistics in Medicine

JF - Statistics in Medicine

IS - 7

ER -