Attitudes, access and anguish: a qualitative interview study of staff and patients' experiences of diabetic retinopathy screening

A. E. Hipwell, J. Sturt*, A. Lindenmeyer, I. Stratton, R. Gadsby, P. O'Hare, P. H. Scanlon

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)
142 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: To examine the experiences of patients, health professionals and screeners; their interactions with and understandings of diabetic retinopathy screening (DRS); and how these influence uptake.

Design: Purposive, qualitative design using multiperspectival, semistructured interviews and thematic analysis.

Setting: Three UK Screening Programme regions with different service-delivery modes, minority ethnic and deprivation levels across rural, urban and inner-city areas, in general practitioner practices and patients’ homes.

Participants: 62 including 38 patients (22 regular-screening attenders, 16 non-regular attenders) and 24 professionals (15 primary care professionals and 9 screeners).

Results: Antecedents to attendance included knowledge about diabetic retinopathy and screening; antecedents to non-attendance included psychological, pragmatic and social factors. Confusion between photographs taken at routine eye tests and DRS photographs was identified. The differing regional invitation methods and screening locations were discussed, with convenience and transport safety being over-riding considerations for patients. Some patients mentioned significant pain and visual disturbance from mydriasis drops as a deterrent to attendance.

Conclusions: In this, the first study to consider multiperspectival experiential accounts, we identified that proactive coordination of care involving patients, primary care and screening programmes, prior to, during and after screening is required. Multiple factors, prior to, during and after screening, are involved in the attendance and non-attendance for DRS. Further research is needed to establish whether patient self-management educational interventions and the pharmacological reformulation of shorter acting mydriasis drops, may improve uptake of DRS. This might, in turn, reduce preventable vision loss and its associated costs to individuals and their families, and to health and social care providers, reducing current inequalities.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere005498
JournalBMJ open
Volume4
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Attitudes, access and anguish: a qualitative interview study of staff and patients' experiences of diabetic retinopathy screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this