Association of systemic inflammation with shock severity, 30-day mortality, and therapy response in patients with cardiogenic shock

Angela Dettling, Jessica Weimann, Jonas Sundermeyer, Benedikt N. Beer, Lisa Besch, Peter M. Becher, Fabian J. Brunner, Stefan Kluge, Paulus Kirchhof, Stefan Blankenberg, Dirk Westermann, Benedikt Schrage*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Mortality in cardiogenic shock (CS) remains high even when mechanical circulatory support (MCS) restores adequate circulation. To detect a potential contribution of systemic inflammation to shock severity, this study determined associations between C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations and outcomes in patients with CS.

Methods: Unselected, consecutive patients with CS and CRP measurements treated at a single large cardiovascular center between 2009 and 2019 were analyzed. Adjusted regression models were fitted to evaluate the association of CRP with shock severity, 30-day in-hospital mortality and treatment response to MCS.

Results: The analysis included 1116 patients [median age: 70 (IQR 58–79) years, 795 (71.3%) male, lactate 4.6 (IQR 2.2–9.5) mmol/l, CRP 17 (IQR 5–71) mg/l]. The cause of CS was acute myocardial infarction in 530 (48%) patients, 648 (58%) patients presented with cardiac arrest. Plasma CRP concentrations were equally distributed across shock severities (SCAI stage B–E). Higher CRP concentrations were associated with 30-day in-hospital mortality (8% relative risk increase per 50 mg/l increase in CRP, range 3–13%; p < 0.001), even after adjustment for CS severity and other potential confounders. Higher CRP concentrations were only associated with higher mortality in patients not treated with MCS [hazard ratio (HR) for CRP > median 1.50; 95%-CI 1.21–1.86; p < 0.001], but not in those treated with MCS (HR for CRP > median 0.92; 95%-CI 0.67–1.26; p = 0.59; p-interaction = 0.01).

Conclusion: Elevated CRP concentrations are associated with increased 30-day in-hospital mortality in unselected patients with cardiogenic shock. The use of mechanical circulatory support attenuates this association.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)324-335
Number of pages12
JournalClinical Research in Cardiology
Volume113
Issue number2
Early online date20 Nov 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2024

Bibliographical note

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL

Conflict of interest:
BS received speaker fees from Abiomed, AstraZeneca and Abbott; and research support from Abiomed, the German Research Foundation and the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung. PK was partially supported by European Union AFFECT-AF (grant agreement 847770), and MAESTRIA (grant agreement 965286), British Heart Foundation (PG/17/30/32961; PG/20/22/35093; AA/18/2/34218), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (DZHK), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ki 509167694), and Leducq Foundation. PK receives research support for basic, translational, and clinical research projects from European Union, British Heart Foundation, Leducq Foundation, Medical Research Council (UK), and German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, from several drug and device companies active in atrial fibrillation, and has received honoraria from several such companies in the past, but not in the last three years. PK is listed as inventor on two issued patents held by University of Hamburg (Atrial Fibrillation Therapy WO 2015140571, Markers for Atrial Fibrillation WO 2016012783). FJB reports grants from Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi, non-financial support from Abbott, ASAHI INTECC, and Inari Medical, personal fees from Amgen and Novartis outside of the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Keywords

  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Mechanical circulatory support
  • Systemic inflammation
  • Mortality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association of systemic inflammation with shock severity, 30-day mortality, and therapy response in patients with cardiogenic shock'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this