Assessing the similarity of nanoforms based on the biodegradation of organic surface treatment chemicals

Richard Cross, Marianne Matzke, Dave Spurgeon, María Diez, Veronica Gonzalez Andres, Elena Cerro Galvez, Maria Fernanda Esponda, Marie France Belinga-Desaunay-Nault, Iseult Lynch, Nina Jeliazkova, Claus Svendsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A substance may have one or more nanoforms, defined for regulatory purposes under EU chemicals legislation REACH based on differences in physicochemical properties such as size, shape, specific surface area and surface chemistry including coatings. To reduce the burden of testing each unique nanoform for the environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials, grouping approaches allow simultaneous assessment of multiple nanoforms. Nanoforms with initially different intrinsic properties, could still be considered similar if their environmental fate and effects can be demonstrated to be similar. One hypothesis to group nanoforms with different organic surface modifications is to use parameters linked to biodegradation of the organic surface. The hypothesis contends that nanoforms with a similar core chemistry, but different organic surface treatments may be grouped, if the surface treatment is likely to be lost through biodegradation rapidly upon entering an environmental compartment, such that it no longer modulates fate, exposure and toxicity of the nanoform. To implement grouping according to surface treatment biodegradability, a robust approach to measure the breakdown of particle surface treatments is needed. We present a tiered testing strategy to assess the biodegradation of organic surface treatments used with nanomaterials that can be implemented as part of an Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA) for grouping based on surface treatment stability. The tiered approach consists of an initial pre-screening MT2 colorimetric carbon substrate utilisation assay, to provide a rapid assessment of coating degradation, and a second tier of testing using OECD Test Guideline 301F for assessing organic chemical biodegradability. Six common surface treatment substances are assessed using the tiered testing strategy to refine rules for escalating between tiers. Similarity assessment using absolute Euclidean distances and x-fold difference concluded that the Tier 1 assessment can be used as conservative binary screening for biodegradability (no false positive results in Tier 1), whilst for substances showing intermediate biodegradation (10–60% in OECD 301F, Tier 2), similarity assessments can be informative for grouping surface treatments not considered readily biodegradable. Further validation using higher tier tests (e.g., mesocosms) is needed to define acceptable limits of similarity between intermediately biodegradable substances, where differences in biodegradability of the surface coating lead to negligible differences in fate, behaviour and toxicity of the nanoforms, and this is critically discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100395
JournalNanoImpact
Volume26
Early online date17 Mar 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The GRACIOUS project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and 1063 Innovation Program under grant agreement No. 760840 . Early work, Protocol Development and Optimization and Conceptualization was performed within the European Union's Horizon 2020 NanoFASE Project under grant agreement No. 646002 .

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science (miscellaneous)
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Safety Research
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the similarity of nanoforms based on the biodegradation of organic surface treatment chemicals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this