An experimental examination of catastrophizing-related interpretation bias for ambiguous facial expressions of pain using an incidental learning task

Ali Khatibi, Martien G. S. Schrooten, Linda M. G. Vancleef, Johan W. S. Vlaeyen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)
135 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Individuals with pain-related concerns are likely to interpret ambiguous pain-related information in a threatening manner. It is unknown whether this interpretation bias also occurs for ambiguous pain-related facial expressions. This study examined whether individuals who habitually attach a catastrophic meaning to pain are characterized by negative interpretation bias for ambiguous pain-related facial expressions. Sixty-four female undergraduates completed an incidental learning task during which pictures of faces were presented, each followed by a visual target at one of two locations. Participants indicated target location by pressing one of two response keys. During the learning phase, happy and painful facial expressions predicted target location. During two test phases, morphed facial expressions of pain and happiness were added, equally often followed by a target at either location. Faster responses following morphs to targets at the location predicted by painful expressions compared to targets at the location predicted by happy expressions were taken to reflect pain-related interpretation bias. During one test phase, faces were preceded by either a safe or threatening context cue. High, but not low, pain-catastrophizers responded faster following morphs to targets at the location predicted by painful expressions than to targets at the other location (when participants were aware of the contingency between expression type and target location). When context cues were presented, there was no indication of interpretation bias. Participants were also asked to directly classify the facial expressions that were presented during the incidental learning task. Participants classified morphs more often as happy than as painful, independent of their level of pain catastrophizing. This observation is discussed in terms of differences between indirect and direct measures of interpretation bias.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1002
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Sept 2014

Keywords

  • painful facial expressions
  • interpretation bias
  • indirect measures
  • incidental learning task
  • direct measures
  • pain catastrophizing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An experimental examination of catastrophizing-related interpretation bias for ambiguous facial expressions of pain using an incidental learning task'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this