An epithelial biomarker signature for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an analysis from the multicentre PROFILE cohort study

Toby M. Maher, Eunice Oballa, Juliet K. Simpson, Joanne Porte, Anthony Habgood, William A. Fahy, Aiden Flynn, Philip L. Molyneaux, Rebecca Braybrooke, Hrushikesh Divyateja, Helen Parfrey, Doris Rassl, Anne Marie Russell, Gauri Saini, Elisabetta A. Renzoni, Anne Marie Duggan, Richard Hubbard, Athol U. Wells, Pauline T. Lukey, Richard P. MarshallR. Gisli Jenkins*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive, fatal disorder with a variable disease trajectory. The aim of this study was to assess potential biomarkers to predict outcomes for people with IPF. Methods PROFILE is a large prospective longitudinal cohort of treatment-naive patients with IPF. We adopted a two-stage discovery and validation design using patients from the PROFILE cohort. For the discovery analysis, we examined 106 patients and 50 age and sex matched healthy controls from Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the Royal Brompton Hospital. We did an unbiased, multiplex immunoassay assessment of 123 biomarkers. We further investigated promising novel markers by immunohistochemical assessment of IPF lung tissue. In the validation analysis, we examined samples from 206 people with IPF from among the remaining 212 patients recruited to PROFILE Central England. We used the samples to attempt to replicate the biomarkers identified from the discovery analysis by use of independent immunoassays for each biomarker. We investigated the predictive power of the selected biomarkers to identify individuals with IPF who were at risk of progression or death. The PROFILE studies are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01134822 (PROFILE Central England) and NCT01110694 (PROFILE Royal Brompton Hospital). Findings In the discovery analysis, we identified four serum biomarkers (surfactant protein D, matrix metalloproteinase 7, CA19-9, and CA-125) that were suitable for replication. Histological assessment of CA19-9 and CA-125 suggested that these proteins were markers of epithelial damage. Replication analysis showed that baseline values of surfactant protein D (46·6 ng/mL vs 34·6 ng/mL, p=0·0018) and CA19-9 (53·7 U/mL vs 22·2 U/mL; p<0·0001) were significantly higher in patients with progressive disease than in patients with stable disease, and rising concentrations of CA-125 over 3 months were associated with increased risk of mortality (HR 2·542, 95% CI 1·493–4·328, p=0·00059). Interpretation We have identified serum proteins secreted from metaplastic epithelium that can be used to predict disease progression and death in IPF. Funding GlaxoSmithKline R&D and the UK Medical Research Council.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)946-955
Number of pages10
JournalThe Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Volume5
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The PROFILE study was funded by the Medical Research Council (G0901226) and GSK R&D (CRT114316), and was sponsored by Nottingham University and Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust. Additionally, TMM is supported by an NIHR Clinician Scientist Fellowship (NIHR ref CS-2013-13-017). RGJ has received support from the Medical Research Council (MICA grant G0901226). We are grateful to all patients for their participation in the PROFILE study and to the Brompton/Imperial NIHR Biomedical Research Unit for infrastructure support in the collection and processing of samples. Tissue used in this study was obtained from the Papworth Hospital Research Tissue Bank and the MRC Nottingham Molecular Pathology Node.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An epithelial biomarker signature for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an analysis from the multicentre PROFILE cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this