A social science view on the FRAME symposium: Identities and networks

Jean Harrington; Neil Stephens

doi:10.1177/026119291003801s11

A social science view on the FRAME symposium: Identities and networks

Jean Harrington, Neil Stephens^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Social Policy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Short survey › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper, written by two social scientists, presents a social science perspective on the issues raised at the FRAME symposium on Human Alternatives to Animal Studies. Drawing upon the authors' experience of conducting research with stem cell scientists, issues around access to human tissue for in vitro uses are considered. The paper concludes by raising questions pertinent to both interested social scientists and the Three Rs agenda.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	101-104
Number of pages	4
Journal	Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
Volume	38
Issue number	SUPPL. 1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/026119291003801s11
Publication status	Published - Dec 2010

Keywords

Biobanking
FRAME
Human tissue
Networks
Three Rs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Medicine

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1177/026119291003801s11

Cite this

@article{718a78206f394a4c80535d8d02d66d1e,

title = "A social science view on the FRAME symposium: Identities and networks",

abstract = "This paper, written by two social scientists, presents a social science perspective on the issues raised at the FRAME symposium on Human Alternatives to Animal Studies. Drawing upon the authors' experience of conducting research with stem cell scientists, issues around access to human tissue for in vitro uses are considered. The paper concludes by raising questions pertinent to both interested social scientists and the Three Rs agenda.",

keywords = "Biobanking, FRAME, Human tissue, Networks, Three Rs",

author = "Jean Harrington and Neil Stephens",

year = "2010",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1177/026119291003801s11",

language = "English",

volume = "38",

pages = "101--104",

journal = "Alternatives to Laboratory Animals",

issn = "0261-1929",

publisher = "Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments",

number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A social science view on the FRAME symposium

T2 - Identities and networks

AU - Harrington, Jean

AU - Stephens, Neil

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - This paper, written by two social scientists, presents a social science perspective on the issues raised at the FRAME symposium on Human Alternatives to Animal Studies. Drawing upon the authors' experience of conducting research with stem cell scientists, issues around access to human tissue for in vitro uses are considered. The paper concludes by raising questions pertinent to both interested social scientists and the Three Rs agenda.

AB - This paper, written by two social scientists, presents a social science perspective on the issues raised at the FRAME symposium on Human Alternatives to Animal Studies. Drawing upon the authors' experience of conducting research with stem cell scientists, issues around access to human tissue for in vitro uses are considered. The paper concludes by raising questions pertinent to both interested social scientists and the Three Rs agenda.

KW - Biobanking

KW - FRAME

KW - Human tissue

KW - Networks

KW - Three Rs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79551695846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/026119291003801s11

DO - 10.1177/026119291003801s11

M3 - Short survey

C2 - 21275488

AN - SCOPUS:79551695846

SN - 0261-1929

VL - 38

SP - 101

EP - 104

JO - Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

JF - Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -

A social science view on the FRAME symposium: Identities and networks

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this