A retrospective observational study on characteristics, treatment patterns, and healthcare resource use of patients with myasthenia gravis in England

Jordy van Enkhuizen*, Jean Binns, April Betts, Fatemeh Saberi Hosnijeh, Myriam Alexander, Mark McCormack, Saiju Jacob

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: There are limited data on the real-world healthcare resource use (HCRU) and management costs of myasthenia gravis (MG) in England.

Objective: This study aims to assess the burden of disease for patients with MG in England.

Design: A retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients diagnosed with MG, using data from the Hospital Episode Statistics data warehouse.

Methods: Patients with a first-ever recorded diagnosis of MG between 30 June 2015 and 30 June 2020 were followed up until 30 June 2021 or death, whichever occurred first. Post-diagnosis patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HCRU, and costs were described. Costs were evaluated using National Health Service reference costs.

Results: A total of 9087 patients with a median follow-up time of 2.9 years (range, 1.7–4.3 years) were included. The mean age at diagnosis was 66.5 years and 53% of the patients were male. A large proportion of patients (72.8%) were admitted as inpatients during follow-up with a mean number of 1.3 admissions. Patients hospitalized for MG-related complications spent a mean of 9.7 days per patient-year in the hospital. During follow-up, 599 (6.6% of the total cohort) and 163 (1.8%) patients had a record of rescue therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange (PLEX), respectively. Rituximab was administered to 81 (0.9%) patients and 268 (2.9%) patients underwent thymectomy. In those patients receiving rescue therapy or rituximab, >10% received at least three cycles of the same treatment. The average annual cost of hospital admissions across all patients treated with IVIg, PLEX, and rituximab were £907,072, £689,979, and £146,726, respectively.

Conclusion: A majority of MG patients required hospitalization or accident and emergency attendance, resulting in high HCRU and costs. A subset of patients required rescue therapy (including IVIg and PLEX), rituximab administration, ventilation, or thymectomy.
Original languageEnglish
JournalTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders
Volume17
Early online date16 Apr 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Apr 2024

Bibliographical note

Funding:
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was sponsored by UCB Pharma.

Keywords

  • myasthenia gravis
  • resource use
  • hospital
  • immunoglobulin
  • costs
  • England

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A retrospective observational study on characteristics, treatment patterns, and healthcare resource use of patients with myasthenia gravis in England'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this