A New Dawn for Gay Rights in Botswana: A Commentary on the Decision of the High Court and Court of Appeal in the Motshidiemang cases

Gosego Rockfall Lekgowe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

50 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In 2003, the Botswanan Court of Appeal decided in Kanane v The State that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation was not proscribed by the Botswanan Constitution because no evidence had been adduced showing that the society of Botswana was ready for gay individuals. After sixteen years, things changed: in 2019, in Letsweletse Motshidiemang and LEGABIBO (as amicus) v The Attorney General, the High Court held that the law criminalizing anal intercourse violated the fundamental rights of gay people. In 2021, the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court decision. This commentary briefly examines these three decisions. It argues that Kanane gave too much weight to public opinion to the detriment of constitutional interpretation. Through a robust approach to generous interpretation of fundamental rights, the Motshidiemang decisions partly remedied the flaw in Kanane. However, judicial clarification is still required on some aspects of the decision.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
JournalJournal of African Law
Early online date3 Jul 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Jul 2023

Keywords

  • Kanane v The State
  • Motshidiemang v The Attorney General
  • “carnal knowledge against the order of nature”
  • LGBTQ+ rights
  • Botswana

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A New Dawn for Gay Rights in Botswana: A Commentary on the Decision of the High Court and Court of Appeal in the Motshidiemang cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this