A cross-validation of Risk Matrix 2000 Sexual and Violent Scales

Leam Craig, Anthony Beech, Kevin Browne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The predictive accuracy of the newly developed actuarial risk measures Risk Matrix 2000 Sexual/Violence (RMS, RMV) were cross validated and compared with two risk assessment measures (SVR-20 and Static-99) in a sample of sexual (n= 85) and nonsex violent (n= 46) offenders. The sexual offense reconviction rate for the sex offender group was 18% at 10 years follow-up, compared with 2% for the violent offenders. Survival analyses revealed the violent offenders were reconvicted at twice the rate compared to sexual offenders. The RMV significantly predicted violent recidivism in the sex and combined sex/violent offender groups. Although the RMS obtained marginal accuracy in predicting sexual reconviction in the sex offender group, none of the scales significantly predicted sexual reconviction. An item analysis revealed four factors not included in the risk scales that were significantly correlated with sexual and violent reconviction. Combining these factors with Static-99, RMV, and RMS increased the accuracy in predicting sexual reconviction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)612-633
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Interpersonal Violence
Volume21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2006

Keywords

  • sexual and violent offenders
  • receiver operating characteristic- area under the curve
  • actuarial and clinically-guided risk assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A cross-validation of Risk Matrix 2000 Sexual and Violent Scales'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this