World Cinema between the rock of the unknowable and the hard place of the as yet unknown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

World Cinema between the rock of the unknowable and the hard place of the as yet unknown. / Stone, Rob; Freijo Escudero, Luis.

In: Transnational Screens, Vol. 12, No. 1, 22.04.2021, p. 1-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{7b62375385fc49f68382ad096b955b6d,
title = "World Cinema between the rock of the unknowable and the hard place of the as yet unknown",
abstract = "Hypotheses that instigated the possibility of destabilising and de-westernising film theory have inspired a critical framework for analysing World Cinema that demands new and evolving understandings of its construction and fluidity, particularly in relation to its lost pasts and possible futures. Referencing several key works in this field and responding to David Martin-Jones{\textquoteright}s Cinema Against Doublethink: Ethical Encounters with the Lost Pasts of World History (2019) in particular, this article questions what is unknowable and as yet unknown about World Cinema. Following Derrida, it argues that the answers lie in how World Cinema gains meaning(s) through the process of diff{\'e}rance (difference and deferral of meaning), particularly through genre. Deploying and dismantling genre theory in case studies of Wind River (Taylor Sheridan, 2017), Chung Hing sam la/Chungking Express (Wong Kar-Wai, 1994), Faa yeung nin wa/In The Mood For Love (Wong Kar-Wai, 2000), Moonlight (Barry Jenkins, 2016) and Widows (Steve McQueen, 2018), the article targets the logjam of ethical hesitancy in approaching World Cinema and, holding that impurities in western cinema constitute trace evidence of new paradigms happening elsewhere in World Cinema, posits empathy and its deferral as essential to an understanding of the dynamics of the cinemas of the world.",
keywords = "World Cinema, de-westernisation, derrida, empathy, genre, theory",
author = "Rob Stone and {Freijo Escudero}, Luis",
note = "Funding: This work was supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council [AH/R012725/1]. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2021",
month = apr,
day = "22",
doi = "10.1080/25785273.2021.1873572",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1--22",
journal = "Transnational Screens",
issn = "2578-5273",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - World Cinema between the rock of the unknowable and the hard place of the as yet unknown

AU - Stone, Rob

AU - Freijo Escudero, Luis

N1 - Funding: This work was supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council [AH/R012725/1]. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2021/4/22

Y1 - 2021/4/22

N2 - Hypotheses that instigated the possibility of destabilising and de-westernising film theory have inspired a critical framework for analysing World Cinema that demands new and evolving understandings of its construction and fluidity, particularly in relation to its lost pasts and possible futures. Referencing several key works in this field and responding to David Martin-Jones’s Cinema Against Doublethink: Ethical Encounters with the Lost Pasts of World History (2019) in particular, this article questions what is unknowable and as yet unknown about World Cinema. Following Derrida, it argues that the answers lie in how World Cinema gains meaning(s) through the process of différance (difference and deferral of meaning), particularly through genre. Deploying and dismantling genre theory in case studies of Wind River (Taylor Sheridan, 2017), Chung Hing sam la/Chungking Express (Wong Kar-Wai, 1994), Faa yeung nin wa/In The Mood For Love (Wong Kar-Wai, 2000), Moonlight (Barry Jenkins, 2016) and Widows (Steve McQueen, 2018), the article targets the logjam of ethical hesitancy in approaching World Cinema and, holding that impurities in western cinema constitute trace evidence of new paradigms happening elsewhere in World Cinema, posits empathy and its deferral as essential to an understanding of the dynamics of the cinemas of the world.

AB - Hypotheses that instigated the possibility of destabilising and de-westernising film theory have inspired a critical framework for analysing World Cinema that demands new and evolving understandings of its construction and fluidity, particularly in relation to its lost pasts and possible futures. Referencing several key works in this field and responding to David Martin-Jones’s Cinema Against Doublethink: Ethical Encounters with the Lost Pasts of World History (2019) in particular, this article questions what is unknowable and as yet unknown about World Cinema. Following Derrida, it argues that the answers lie in how World Cinema gains meaning(s) through the process of différance (difference and deferral of meaning), particularly through genre. Deploying and dismantling genre theory in case studies of Wind River (Taylor Sheridan, 2017), Chung Hing sam la/Chungking Express (Wong Kar-Wai, 1994), Faa yeung nin wa/In The Mood For Love (Wong Kar-Wai, 2000), Moonlight (Barry Jenkins, 2016) and Widows (Steve McQueen, 2018), the article targets the logjam of ethical hesitancy in approaching World Cinema and, holding that impurities in western cinema constitute trace evidence of new paradigms happening elsewhere in World Cinema, posits empathy and its deferral as essential to an understanding of the dynamics of the cinemas of the world.

KW - World Cinema

KW - de-westernisation

KW - derrida

KW - empathy

KW - genre

KW - theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104817187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/25785273.2021.1873572

DO - 10.1080/25785273.2021.1873572

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 1

EP - 22

JO - Transnational Screens

JF - Transnational Screens

SN - 2578-5273

IS - 1

ER -