What is the minimum number of specialist anaesthetists needed in low-income and middle-income countries?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

What is the minimum number of specialist anaesthetists needed in low-income and middle-income countries? / Davies, Justine; Vreede, Eric ; Onajin-Obembe, Bisola ; Morriss, Wayne W .

In: BMJ Global Health, Vol. 3, No. 6, e001005, 01.12.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Davies, Justine ; Vreede, Eric ; Onajin-Obembe, Bisola ; Morriss, Wayne W . / What is the minimum number of specialist anaesthetists needed in low-income and middle-income countries?. In: BMJ Global Health. 2018 ; Vol. 3, No. 6.

Bibtex

@article{0778260b823647969821747cd553a5cc,
title = "What is the minimum number of specialist anaesthetists needed in low-income and middle-income countries?",
abstract = "Introduction The number of specialist anaesthetists in most low-income and middle-income countries is below what is needed to provide a safe quality anaesthesia service. There are no estimates of the optimal number; therefore, we estimated the minimum density of specialist anaesthetists to achieve a reasonable standard of healthcare as indicated by the maternal mortality ratio(MMR).Methods Utilising existing country-level data of the number of physician anaesthesia providers (PAPs), MMR and Human Development Index (HDI), we developed best-fit curves to describe the relationship between MMRand PAPs, controlling for HDI. The aim was to use this relationship to estimate the number of PAPs associated with achieving the median MMR.Results We estimated that, in order to achieve a reasonable standard of healthcare, as indicated by the global median MMR, countries should aim to have at least four PAPs per 100 000 population. Existing data show that currently 80 countries have fewer than this number.Conclusion Four PAPs per 100 000 population is a modest target, but there is a need to increase training of doctors in many countries in order to train more specialist anaesthetists. It is important that this target is considered during the development of national workforce plans, even if a stepwise approach to workforce planning is chosen.",
keywords = "Anaesthesia, Global Health, Global Surgery",
author = "Justine Davies and Eric Vreede and Bisola Onajin-Obembe and Morriss, {Wayne W}",
year = "2018",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001005",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "BMJ Global Health",
issn = "2059-7908",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the minimum number of specialist anaesthetists needed in low-income and middle-income countries?

AU - Davies, Justine

AU - Vreede, Eric

AU - Onajin-Obembe, Bisola

AU - Morriss, Wayne W

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Introduction The number of specialist anaesthetists in most low-income and middle-income countries is below what is needed to provide a safe quality anaesthesia service. There are no estimates of the optimal number; therefore, we estimated the minimum density of specialist anaesthetists to achieve a reasonable standard of healthcare as indicated by the maternal mortality ratio(MMR).Methods Utilising existing country-level data of the number of physician anaesthesia providers (PAPs), MMR and Human Development Index (HDI), we developed best-fit curves to describe the relationship between MMRand PAPs, controlling for HDI. The aim was to use this relationship to estimate the number of PAPs associated with achieving the median MMR.Results We estimated that, in order to achieve a reasonable standard of healthcare, as indicated by the global median MMR, countries should aim to have at least four PAPs per 100 000 population. Existing data show that currently 80 countries have fewer than this number.Conclusion Four PAPs per 100 000 population is a modest target, but there is a need to increase training of doctors in many countries in order to train more specialist anaesthetists. It is important that this target is considered during the development of national workforce plans, even if a stepwise approach to workforce planning is chosen.

AB - Introduction The number of specialist anaesthetists in most low-income and middle-income countries is below what is needed to provide a safe quality anaesthesia service. There are no estimates of the optimal number; therefore, we estimated the minimum density of specialist anaesthetists to achieve a reasonable standard of healthcare as indicated by the maternal mortality ratio(MMR).Methods Utilising existing country-level data of the number of physician anaesthesia providers (PAPs), MMR and Human Development Index (HDI), we developed best-fit curves to describe the relationship between MMRand PAPs, controlling for HDI. The aim was to use this relationship to estimate the number of PAPs associated with achieving the median MMR.Results We estimated that, in order to achieve a reasonable standard of healthcare, as indicated by the global median MMR, countries should aim to have at least four PAPs per 100 000 population. Existing data show that currently 80 countries have fewer than this number.Conclusion Four PAPs per 100 000 population is a modest target, but there is a need to increase training of doctors in many countries in order to train more specialist anaesthetists. It is important that this target is considered during the development of national workforce plans, even if a stepwise approach to workforce planning is chosen.

KW - Anaesthesia

KW - Global Health

KW - Global Surgery

U2 - 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001005

DO - 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001005

M3 - Article

C2 - 30588342

VL - 3

JO - BMJ Global Health

JF - BMJ Global Health

SN - 2059-7908

IS - 6

M1 - e001005

ER -