What drives responses to willingness-to-pay questions? A methodological inquiry in the context of hypertension self-management.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Authors

  • Billingsley Kaambwa
  • Stirling Bryan
  • Richard McManus

Colleges, School and Institutes

Abstract

Background
The use of economic evaluation to determine the cost-effectiveness of health interventions is recommended by decision-making bodies internationally. Understanding factors that explain variations in costs and benefits is important for policy makers.

Objectives
This work aimed to test a priori hypotheses defining the relationship between benefits of using self-management equipment (measured using the willingness to pay (WTP) approach) and a number of demographic and other patient factors.

Methods
Data for this study were collected as part of the first major randomised controlled trial of self-monitoring combined with self-titration in hypertension (TASMINH2). A contingent valuation framework was used with patients asked to indicate how much they were willing to pay for equipment used for self-managing hypertension. Descriptive statistics, simple statistical tests of differences and multivariate regression were used to test six a priori hypotheses.

Results
393 hypertensive patients (204 in the intervention and 189 in the control) were willing to pay for self-management equipment and 85% of these (335) provided positive WTP values. Three hypotheses were accepted: higher WTP values were associated with being male, higher household incomes and satisfaction with the equipment. Prior experiences of using this equipment, age and changes in blood pressure were not significantly related to WTP.

Conclusion
The majority of hypertensive patients who had taken part in a self-management study were prepared to purchase the self-monitoring equipment using their own funds, more so for men, those with higher incomes and those with greater satisfaction. Further research based on bigger and more diverse populations is recommended.

Details

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 22 Aug 2016