We Spend How Much? Misperceptions, Innumeracy, and Support for the Foreign Aid in the United States and Great Britain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

We Spend How Much? Misperceptions, Innumeracy, and Support for the Foreign Aid in the United States and Great Britain. / Scotto, Thomas J.; Reifler, Jason; Hudson, David; Vanheerde-Hudson, Jennifer.

In: Journal of Experimental Political Science, Vol. 4, No. 2, 14.09.2017, p. 119-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{229f94ca34124160930b0972873ba38b,
title = "We Spend How Much? Misperceptions, Innumeracy, and Support for the Foreign Aid in the United States and Great Britain",
abstract = "Majorities of citizens in high-income countries often oppose foreign aid spending. One popular explanation is that the public overestimates the percentage and amount of taxpayer funds that goes toward overseas aid. Does expressing aid flows in dollar and/or percentage terms shift public opinion toward aid? We report the results of an experiment examining differences in support for aid spending as a function of the information American and British respondents receive about foreign aid spending. In both nations, providing respondents with information about foreign aid spending as a percentage of the national budget significantly reduces support for cuts. The findings suggest that support for aid can be increased, but significant opposition to aid spending remains.",
keywords = "framing development communications, aid spending, innumeracy, public opinion",
author = "Scotto, {Thomas J.} and Jason Reifler and David Hudson and Jennifer Vanheerde-Hudson",
year = "2017",
month = sep,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1017/XPS.2017.6",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "119--128",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Political Science",
issn = "2052-2630",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - We Spend How Much? Misperceptions, Innumeracy, and Support for the Foreign Aid in the United States and Great Britain

AU - Scotto, Thomas J.

AU - Reifler, Jason

AU - Hudson, David

AU - Vanheerde-Hudson, Jennifer

PY - 2017/9/14

Y1 - 2017/9/14

N2 - Majorities of citizens in high-income countries often oppose foreign aid spending. One popular explanation is that the public overestimates the percentage and amount of taxpayer funds that goes toward overseas aid. Does expressing aid flows in dollar and/or percentage terms shift public opinion toward aid? We report the results of an experiment examining differences in support for aid spending as a function of the information American and British respondents receive about foreign aid spending. In both nations, providing respondents with information about foreign aid spending as a percentage of the national budget significantly reduces support for cuts. The findings suggest that support for aid can be increased, but significant opposition to aid spending remains.

AB - Majorities of citizens in high-income countries often oppose foreign aid spending. One popular explanation is that the public overestimates the percentage and amount of taxpayer funds that goes toward overseas aid. Does expressing aid flows in dollar and/or percentage terms shift public opinion toward aid? We report the results of an experiment examining differences in support for aid spending as a function of the information American and British respondents receive about foreign aid spending. In both nations, providing respondents with information about foreign aid spending as a percentage of the national budget significantly reduces support for cuts. The findings suggest that support for aid can be increased, but significant opposition to aid spending remains.

KW - framing development communications

KW - aid spending

KW - innumeracy

KW - public opinion

U2 - 10.1017/XPS.2017.6

DO - 10.1017/XPS.2017.6

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 119

EP - 128

JO - Journal of Experimental Political Science

JF - Journal of Experimental Political Science

SN - 2052-2630

IS - 2

ER -