We Spend How Much? Misperceptions, Innumeracy, and Support for the Foreign Aid in the United States and Great Britain

Thomas J. Scotto, Jason Reifler, David Hudson, Jennifer Vanheerde-Hudson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
518 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Majorities of citizens in high-income countries often oppose foreign aid spending. One popular explanation is that the public overestimates the percentage and amount of taxpayer funds that goes toward overseas aid. Does expressing aid flows in dollar and/or percentage terms shift public opinion toward aid? We report the results of an experiment examining differences in support for aid spending as a function of the information American and British respondents receive about foreign aid spending. In both nations, providing respondents with information about foreign aid spending as a percentage of the national budget significantly reduces support for cuts. The findings suggest that support for aid can be increased, but significant opposition to aid spending remains.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-128
JournalJournal of Experimental Political Science
Volume4
Issue number2
Early online date14 Sept 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 14 Sept 2017

Keywords

  • framing development communications
  • aid spending
  • innumeracy
  • public opinion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'We Spend How Much? Misperceptions, Innumeracy, and Support for the Foreign Aid in the United States and Great Britain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this