Volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass graft surgery : true association or artefact?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass graft surgery : true association or artefact? / Sowden, A J; Deeks, J J; Sheldon, T A.

In: British Medical Journal, Vol. 311, No. 6998, 15.07.1995, p. 151-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{755117f78b184bafb56280db2db63bcf,
title = "Volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass graft surgery : true association or artefact?",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To examine the evidence for a relation between volume of coronary artery bypass graft surgery and hospital death rates, and to assess the degree to which this could be due to confounding because of differences in case mix.SUBJECTS: People receiving coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the United States.DESIGN: A systematic review of empirical studies examining the relation between volume and outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Studies were scored according to degree of adjustment for case mix. Above 200 procedures a year was regarded as high volume.RESULTS: Fifteen studies were identified, all of which used observational data from the United States for 1972-92. Six were included in the analysis, one was included in a sensitivity analysis, and eight were excluded because of duplicate analyses of data sources and methods of reporting results. The seven studies analysed reported a reduced mortality with increased volume. Studies with better adjustment for case mix, however, indicated less reduction in mortality with increased volume (P = 0.04). The apparent advantages of higher volume also decreased over time (P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for reduced mortality in hospitals with a high volume of coronary artery bypass graft surgery is based entirely on observational studies. These studies may have over-estimated the benefit of increased volume because of poor adjustment for case mix. It signals the need for caution in interpreting the results of observational studies that examine the relation between volume and outcome.",
keywords = "Confounding Factors (Epidemiology), Coronary Artery Bypass, Diagnosis-Related Groups, Hospital Mortality, Humans, Treatment Outcome, United States",
author = "Sowden, {A J} and Deeks, {J J} and Sheldon, {T A}",
year = "1995",
month = jul,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1136/bmj.311.6998.151",
language = "English",
volume = "311",
pages = "151--155",
journal = "British Medical Journal",
issn = "0959-8138",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6998",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass graft surgery : true association or artefact?

AU - Sowden, A J

AU - Deeks, J J

AU - Sheldon, T A

PY - 1995/7/15

Y1 - 1995/7/15

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To examine the evidence for a relation between volume of coronary artery bypass graft surgery and hospital death rates, and to assess the degree to which this could be due to confounding because of differences in case mix.SUBJECTS: People receiving coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the United States.DESIGN: A systematic review of empirical studies examining the relation between volume and outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Studies were scored according to degree of adjustment for case mix. Above 200 procedures a year was regarded as high volume.RESULTS: Fifteen studies were identified, all of which used observational data from the United States for 1972-92. Six were included in the analysis, one was included in a sensitivity analysis, and eight were excluded because of duplicate analyses of data sources and methods of reporting results. The seven studies analysed reported a reduced mortality with increased volume. Studies with better adjustment for case mix, however, indicated less reduction in mortality with increased volume (P = 0.04). The apparent advantages of higher volume also decreased over time (P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for reduced mortality in hospitals with a high volume of coronary artery bypass graft surgery is based entirely on observational studies. These studies may have over-estimated the benefit of increased volume because of poor adjustment for case mix. It signals the need for caution in interpreting the results of observational studies that examine the relation between volume and outcome.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To examine the evidence for a relation between volume of coronary artery bypass graft surgery and hospital death rates, and to assess the degree to which this could be due to confounding because of differences in case mix.SUBJECTS: People receiving coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the United States.DESIGN: A systematic review of empirical studies examining the relation between volume and outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Studies were scored according to degree of adjustment for case mix. Above 200 procedures a year was regarded as high volume.RESULTS: Fifteen studies were identified, all of which used observational data from the United States for 1972-92. Six were included in the analysis, one was included in a sensitivity analysis, and eight were excluded because of duplicate analyses of data sources and methods of reporting results. The seven studies analysed reported a reduced mortality with increased volume. Studies with better adjustment for case mix, however, indicated less reduction in mortality with increased volume (P = 0.04). The apparent advantages of higher volume also decreased over time (P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for reduced mortality in hospitals with a high volume of coronary artery bypass graft surgery is based entirely on observational studies. These studies may have over-estimated the benefit of increased volume because of poor adjustment for case mix. It signals the need for caution in interpreting the results of observational studies that examine the relation between volume and outcome.

KW - Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)

KW - Coronary Artery Bypass

KW - Diagnosis-Related Groups

KW - Hospital Mortality

KW - Humans

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - United States

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.311.6998.151

DO - 10.1136/bmj.311.6998.151

M3 - Article

C2 - 7613425

VL - 311

SP - 151

EP - 155

JO - British Medical Journal

JF - British Medical Journal

SN - 0959-8138

IS - 6998

ER -