Visual search within versus across dimensions: A case for within-dimension grouping

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Visual search within versus across dimensions: A case for within-dimension grouping. / Linnell, Karina; Humphreys, Glyn.

In: British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 93, No. 1, 01.02.2002, p. 115-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{7e51384217a2423794c16fb422c775bc,
title = "Visual search within versus across dimensions: A case for within-dimension grouping",
abstract = "We used a visual search task in which participants searched for the presence of either both members or just one member of pairs of spatially separated simple visual features. Pairs of target features could be drawn either from within the same dimension (two colours, or two orientations) or from across two different dimensions (one colour and one orientation). In Experiment 1, display items carrying target and non-target features (target and distractor items respectively) were presented at interspersed spatial locations. Reaction times (RTs) to find both of two feature targets were generally slower than to find one feature target for within- and across-dimension target pairs alike. This slowing was approximately constant across display set sizes, with one exception: for within-dimension targets, two features could be detected as fast as single features when there were just two items in displays. Experiment 2 replicated the finding across all display set sizes when target items were always spatially adjacent rather than interspersed with distractor items. We interpret these data in terms of grouping between target features within the same dimension, and argue against there being any qualitative limit on visual processing or selection when target features come from a single dimension relative to when they come from separate dimensions.",
author = "Karina Linnell and Glyn Humphreys",
year = "2002",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1348/000712602162472",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "115--136.",
journal = "British Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0007-1269",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual search within versus across dimensions: A case for within-dimension grouping

AU - Linnell, Karina

AU - Humphreys, Glyn

PY - 2002/2/1

Y1 - 2002/2/1

N2 - We used a visual search task in which participants searched for the presence of either both members or just one member of pairs of spatially separated simple visual features. Pairs of target features could be drawn either from within the same dimension (two colours, or two orientations) or from across two different dimensions (one colour and one orientation). In Experiment 1, display items carrying target and non-target features (target and distractor items respectively) were presented at interspersed spatial locations. Reaction times (RTs) to find both of two feature targets were generally slower than to find one feature target for within- and across-dimension target pairs alike. This slowing was approximately constant across display set sizes, with one exception: for within-dimension targets, two features could be detected as fast as single features when there were just two items in displays. Experiment 2 replicated the finding across all display set sizes when target items were always spatially adjacent rather than interspersed with distractor items. We interpret these data in terms of grouping between target features within the same dimension, and argue against there being any qualitative limit on visual processing or selection when target features come from a single dimension relative to when they come from separate dimensions.

AB - We used a visual search task in which participants searched for the presence of either both members or just one member of pairs of spatially separated simple visual features. Pairs of target features could be drawn either from within the same dimension (two colours, or two orientations) or from across two different dimensions (one colour and one orientation). In Experiment 1, display items carrying target and non-target features (target and distractor items respectively) were presented at interspersed spatial locations. Reaction times (RTs) to find both of two feature targets were generally slower than to find one feature target for within- and across-dimension target pairs alike. This slowing was approximately constant across display set sizes, with one exception: for within-dimension targets, two features could be detected as fast as single features when there were just two items in displays. Experiment 2 replicated the finding across all display set sizes when target items were always spatially adjacent rather than interspersed with distractor items. We interpret these data in terms of grouping between target features within the same dimension, and argue against there being any qualitative limit on visual processing or selection when target features come from a single dimension relative to when they come from separate dimensions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036003070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1348/000712602162472

DO - 10.1348/000712602162472

M3 - Article

VL - 93

SP - 115-136.

JO - British Journal of Psychology

JF - British Journal of Psychology

SN - 0007-1269

IS - 1

ER -