Use of the learning conversation improves instructor confidence in life support training: an open randomised controlled cross-over trial comparing teaching feedback mechanisms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Use of the learning conversation improves instructor confidence in life support training : an open randomised controlled cross-over trial comparing teaching feedback mechanisms. / Baldwin, Lydia J.l.; Jones, Christopher; Hulme, Jonathan; Owen, Andrew.

In: Resuscitation, Vol. 96, 11.2015, p. 199-207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{389cd882661744a580f3242c47687de2,
title = "Use of the learning conversation improves instructor confidence in life support training: an open randomised controlled cross-over trial comparing teaching feedback mechanisms",
abstract = "Aims Feedback is vital for the effective delivery of skills-based education. We sought to compare the sandwich technique and learning conversation structured methods of feedback delivery in competency-based basic life support (BLS) training. Methods Open randomised crossover study undertaken between October 2014 and March 2015 at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Six-hundred and forty healthcare students undertaking a European Resuscitation Council (ERC) BLS course were enrolled, each of whom was randomised to receive teaching using either the sandwich technique or the learning conversation. Fifty-eight instructors were randomised to initially teach using either the learning conversation or sandwich technique, prior to crossing-over and teaching with the alternative technique after a pre-defined time period. Outcome measures included skill acquisition as measured by an end-of-course competency assessment, instructors{\textquoteright} perception of teaching with each feedback technique and candidates{\textquoteright} perception of the feedback they were provided with. Results Scores assigned to use of the learning conversation by instructors were significantly more favourable than for the sandwich technique across all but two assessed domains relating to instructor perception of the feedback technique, including all skills-based domains. No difference was seen in either assessment pass rates (80.9% sandwich technique vs. 77.2% learning conversation; OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.85–1.84; p = 0.29) or any domain relating to candidates{\textquoteright} perception of their teaching technique. Conclusions & relevance This is the first direct comparison of two feedback techniques in clinical medical education using both quantitative and qualitative methodology. The learning conversation is preferred by instructors providing competency-based life support training and is perceived to favour skills acquisition.",
keywords = "Feedback, Sandwich technique, Learning conversation, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), Basic life support (BLS), Resuscitation",
author = "Baldwin, {Lydia J.l.} and Christopher Jones and Jonathan Hulme and Andrew Owen",
year = "2015",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.08.010",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "199--207",
journal = "Resuscitation",
issn = "0300-9572",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of the learning conversation improves instructor confidence in life support training

T2 - an open randomised controlled cross-over trial comparing teaching feedback mechanisms

AU - Baldwin, Lydia J.l.

AU - Jones, Christopher

AU - Hulme, Jonathan

AU - Owen, Andrew

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - Aims Feedback is vital for the effective delivery of skills-based education. We sought to compare the sandwich technique and learning conversation structured methods of feedback delivery in competency-based basic life support (BLS) training. Methods Open randomised crossover study undertaken between October 2014 and March 2015 at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Six-hundred and forty healthcare students undertaking a European Resuscitation Council (ERC) BLS course were enrolled, each of whom was randomised to receive teaching using either the sandwich technique or the learning conversation. Fifty-eight instructors were randomised to initially teach using either the learning conversation or sandwich technique, prior to crossing-over and teaching with the alternative technique after a pre-defined time period. Outcome measures included skill acquisition as measured by an end-of-course competency assessment, instructors’ perception of teaching with each feedback technique and candidates’ perception of the feedback they were provided with. Results Scores assigned to use of the learning conversation by instructors were significantly more favourable than for the sandwich technique across all but two assessed domains relating to instructor perception of the feedback technique, including all skills-based domains. No difference was seen in either assessment pass rates (80.9% sandwich technique vs. 77.2% learning conversation; OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.85–1.84; p = 0.29) or any domain relating to candidates’ perception of their teaching technique. Conclusions & relevance This is the first direct comparison of two feedback techniques in clinical medical education using both quantitative and qualitative methodology. The learning conversation is preferred by instructors providing competency-based life support training and is perceived to favour skills acquisition.

AB - Aims Feedback is vital for the effective delivery of skills-based education. We sought to compare the sandwich technique and learning conversation structured methods of feedback delivery in competency-based basic life support (BLS) training. Methods Open randomised crossover study undertaken between October 2014 and March 2015 at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Six-hundred and forty healthcare students undertaking a European Resuscitation Council (ERC) BLS course were enrolled, each of whom was randomised to receive teaching using either the sandwich technique or the learning conversation. Fifty-eight instructors were randomised to initially teach using either the learning conversation or sandwich technique, prior to crossing-over and teaching with the alternative technique after a pre-defined time period. Outcome measures included skill acquisition as measured by an end-of-course competency assessment, instructors’ perception of teaching with each feedback technique and candidates’ perception of the feedback they were provided with. Results Scores assigned to use of the learning conversation by instructors were significantly more favourable than for the sandwich technique across all but two assessed domains relating to instructor perception of the feedback technique, including all skills-based domains. No difference was seen in either assessment pass rates (80.9% sandwich technique vs. 77.2% learning conversation; OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.85–1.84; p = 0.29) or any domain relating to candidates’ perception of their teaching technique. Conclusions & relevance This is the first direct comparison of two feedback techniques in clinical medical education using both quantitative and qualitative methodology. The learning conversation is preferred by instructors providing competency-based life support training and is perceived to favour skills acquisition.

KW - Feedback

KW - Sandwich technique

KW - Learning conversation

KW - Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)

KW - Basic life support (BLS)

KW - Resuscitation

U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.08.010

DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.08.010

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 199

EP - 207

JO - Resuscitation

JF - Resuscitation

SN - 0300-9572

ER -