Understanding resilience in international relations: the Non-Aligned Movement and ontological security

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Understanding resilience in international relations : the Non-Aligned Movement and ontological security. / Vieira, Marco.

In: International Studies Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, 06.2016, p. 290-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{0915449a5c6f4633a02cca38e6059b23,
title = "Understanding resilience in international relations: the Non-Aligned Movement and ontological security",
abstract = "Born more than half a century ago, the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) embodied the collective identity and aspirations of newly independent nations in Africa and Asia. Since the end of the Cold War, NAM{\textquoteright}s relevance has been brought into question given the passing of the geopolitical context that motivated its creation. More recently, in the wake of the NAM{\textquoteright}s Tehran meeting in August 2012, myriad analyses have yet again questioned NAM{\textquoteright}s political effectiveness and legitimacy as an ideologically coherent vehicle for developing countries{\textquoteright} definition of common positions on a host of global issues. Drawing from the literature on ontological security, I argue that NAM{\textquoteright}s enduring relevance, legitimacy and institutional resilience are the result of some of its key member states{\textquoteright} adherence to the core principles of non-alignment. Notwithstanding theprofound changes in both the international system and in the political and socio-economic contexts of most NAM{\textquoteright}s members since the movement{\textquoteright}s creation, these principles have fundamentally shaped their post-colonial identities in international relations. I claim that NAM{\textquoteright}s contemporary resilience derives from the stabilising sense of continuity the movement provides by reifying developing states{\textquoteright} shared identity in an increasingly de-centred and uncertain global order.",
author = "Marco Vieira",
year = "2016",
month = jun
doi = "10.1093/isr/viw002",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "290--311",
journal = "International Studies Review",
issn = "1521-9488",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding resilience in international relations

T2 - the Non-Aligned Movement and ontological security

AU - Vieira, Marco

PY - 2016/6

Y1 - 2016/6

N2 - Born more than half a century ago, the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) embodied the collective identity and aspirations of newly independent nations in Africa and Asia. Since the end of the Cold War, NAM’s relevance has been brought into question given the passing of the geopolitical context that motivated its creation. More recently, in the wake of the NAM’s Tehran meeting in August 2012, myriad analyses have yet again questioned NAM’s political effectiveness and legitimacy as an ideologically coherent vehicle for developing countries’ definition of common positions on a host of global issues. Drawing from the literature on ontological security, I argue that NAM’s enduring relevance, legitimacy and institutional resilience are the result of some of its key member states’ adherence to the core principles of non-alignment. Notwithstanding theprofound changes in both the international system and in the political and socio-economic contexts of most NAM’s members since the movement’s creation, these principles have fundamentally shaped their post-colonial identities in international relations. I claim that NAM’s contemporary resilience derives from the stabilising sense of continuity the movement provides by reifying developing states’ shared identity in an increasingly de-centred and uncertain global order.

AB - Born more than half a century ago, the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) embodied the collective identity and aspirations of newly independent nations in Africa and Asia. Since the end of the Cold War, NAM’s relevance has been brought into question given the passing of the geopolitical context that motivated its creation. More recently, in the wake of the NAM’s Tehran meeting in August 2012, myriad analyses have yet again questioned NAM’s political effectiveness and legitimacy as an ideologically coherent vehicle for developing countries’ definition of common positions on a host of global issues. Drawing from the literature on ontological security, I argue that NAM’s enduring relevance, legitimacy and institutional resilience are the result of some of its key member states’ adherence to the core principles of non-alignment. Notwithstanding theprofound changes in both the international system and in the political and socio-economic contexts of most NAM’s members since the movement’s creation, these principles have fundamentally shaped their post-colonial identities in international relations. I claim that NAM’s contemporary resilience derives from the stabilising sense of continuity the movement provides by reifying developing states’ shared identity in an increasingly de-centred and uncertain global order.

U2 - 10.1093/isr/viw002

DO - 10.1093/isr/viw002

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 290

EP - 311

JO - International Studies Review

JF - International Studies Review

SN - 1521-9488

IS - 2

ER -