Ultimate response of stainless steel continuous beams

Marios Theofanous*, N. Saliba, O. Zhao, L. Gardner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)
340 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

An experimental study of stainless steel continuous beams not susceptible to lateral torsional buckling is reported in this paper and the applicability of plastic design methods to such structures is considered. A total of 18 two-span continuous beams were tested. Three cross-section types - cold-formed square hollow sections (SHS), cold-formed rectangular hollow sections (RHS) and welded I-sections, and two material grades - austenitic EN 1.4301/1.4307 and lean duplex EN 1.4162, were considered. The geometric and material properties of the continuous beam test specimens were carefully recorded and supplemented by tests on simply supported specimens of the same cross-sections. The test specimens covered a wide range of cross-section slendernesses and two different loading positions were adopted. The experimental results were used to assess the degree of moment redistribution in indeterminate stainless steel structures and the applicability of both conventional and novel plastic design methods, including an extension of the continuous strength method (CSM). Comparisons indicated that conventional plastic design is applicable to stainless steel structures, while greater efficiency can be achieved by considering strain-hardening through the CSM.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-127
Number of pages13
JournalThin-Walled Structures
Volume83
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014

Keywords

  • Continuous strength method
  • Indeterminate structures
  • Moment redistribution
  • Plastic design
  • Stainless steel structures
  • Tests

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ultimate response of stainless steel continuous beams'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this