Transnational health law beyond the private/public divide: the case of reproductive rights

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Standard

Transnational health law beyond the private/public divide : the case of reproductive rights. / Krajewska, Atina.

In: Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 45, No. S1, 18.07.2018, p. S220-S244.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Krajewska, A 2018, 'Transnational health law beyond the private/public divide: the case of reproductive rights', Journal of Law and Society, vol. 45, no. S1, pp. S220-S244. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12111

APA

Krajewska, A. (2018). Transnational health law beyond the private/public divide: the case of reproductive rights. Journal of Law and Society, 45(S1), S220-S244. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12111

Vancouver

Krajewska A. Transnational health law beyond the private/public divide: the case of reproductive rights. Journal of Law and Society. 2018 Jul 18;45(S1):S220-S244. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12111

Author

Krajewska, Atina. / Transnational health law beyond the private/public divide : the case of reproductive rights. In: Journal of Law and Society. 2018 ; Vol. 45, No. S1. pp. S220-S244.

Bibtex

@article{dd24740967b44f2bb96d4927cae31298,
title = "Transnational health law beyond the private/public divide: the case of reproductive rights",
abstract = "This article revisits the debates concerning the nature and patterns of development of transnational law and global constitutionalism, looking at the rapidly growing field of transnational health law. It first highlights a friction between two opposing theories of transnational law, which view it as either a predominantly private or a predominantly public construction. It goes on to argue that these two views need not necessarily be seen as exclusive and diametrically opposed, but as two distinct, yet interrelated, aspects of the same process in which legal subjectivity is established in transnational law. The article studies the emergence of legal subjectivity in the area of transnational law regulating assisted reproduction technologies, and maps the two different conceptions of transnational law onto different stages in the process by which new subjects become legally visible. It contributes to wider discussions concerning the nature of transnational law, transnational health law, and legal subjectivity.",
author = "Atina Krajewska",
year = "2018",
month = jul,
day = "18",
doi = "10.1111/jols.12111",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "S220--S244",
journal = "Journal of Law and Society",
issn = "0263-323X",
publisher = "Wiley Online Library",
number = "S1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transnational health law beyond the private/public divide

T2 - the case of reproductive rights

AU - Krajewska, Atina

PY - 2018/7/18

Y1 - 2018/7/18

N2 - This article revisits the debates concerning the nature and patterns of development of transnational law and global constitutionalism, looking at the rapidly growing field of transnational health law. It first highlights a friction between two opposing theories of transnational law, which view it as either a predominantly private or a predominantly public construction. It goes on to argue that these two views need not necessarily be seen as exclusive and diametrically opposed, but as two distinct, yet interrelated, aspects of the same process in which legal subjectivity is established in transnational law. The article studies the emergence of legal subjectivity in the area of transnational law regulating assisted reproduction technologies, and maps the two different conceptions of transnational law onto different stages in the process by which new subjects become legally visible. It contributes to wider discussions concerning the nature of transnational law, transnational health law, and legal subjectivity.

AB - This article revisits the debates concerning the nature and patterns of development of transnational law and global constitutionalism, looking at the rapidly growing field of transnational health law. It first highlights a friction between two opposing theories of transnational law, which view it as either a predominantly private or a predominantly public construction. It goes on to argue that these two views need not necessarily be seen as exclusive and diametrically opposed, but as two distinct, yet interrelated, aspects of the same process in which legal subjectivity is established in transnational law. The article studies the emergence of legal subjectivity in the area of transnational law regulating assisted reproduction technologies, and maps the two different conceptions of transnational law onto different stages in the process by which new subjects become legally visible. It contributes to wider discussions concerning the nature of transnational law, transnational health law, and legal subjectivity.

U2 - 10.1111/jols.12111

DO - 10.1111/jols.12111

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - S220-S244

JO - Journal of Law and Society

JF - Journal of Law and Society

SN - 0263-323X

IS - S1

ER -