Towards clinical application of prediction models for transition to psychosis: a systematic review and external validation study in the PRONIA Sample

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Authors

  • PRONIA Consortium

External organisations

  • Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne
  • University Institute of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Aston University
  • Ludwig-Maximilian-University
  • University of Bari Aldo Moro
  • University of Milan
  • University of Lübeck
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
  • Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Turku University and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Orygen
  • Centre for Youth Mental Health
  • University of Manchester

Abstract

A multitude of prediction models for a first psychotic episode in individuals at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis have been proposed, but only rarely validated. We identified transition models based on clinical and neuropsychological data through a registered systematic literature search and evaluated their external validity in 173 CHRs from the Personalised Prognostic Tools for Early Psychosis Management (PRONIA) study. Discrimination performance was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and compared to the prediction of clinical raters. External discrimination performance varied considerably across the 22 identified models (AUC 0.40-0.76), with two models showing good discrimination performance. None of the tested models significantly outperformed clinical raters (AUC = 0.75). Combining predictions of clinical raters and the best model descriptively improved discrimination performance (AUC = 0.84). Results show that personalized prediction of transition in CHR is potentially feasible on a global scale. For implementation in clinical practice, further rounds of external validation, impact studies, and development of an ethical framework is necessary.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)478-492
Number of pages15
JournalNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews
Volume125
Early online date23 Feb 2021
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Feb 2021

Keywords

  • psychosis, clinical high-risk, prediction, model validation, early intervention, precision medicine, translational psychiatry