The role of eye movements in manual responses to social and nonsocial cues

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

The role of eye movements in manual responses to social and nonsocial cues. / Bonmassar, Claudia; Pavani, Francesco; van Zoest, Wieske.

In: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, Vol. 81, No. 5, 15.07.2019, p. 1236-1252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{6e8d19f5700249eeb6918ec4ef8edc7e,
title = "The role of eye movements in manual responses to social and nonsocial cues",
abstract = "Gaze and arrow cues cause covert attention shifts even when they are uninformative. Nonetheless, it is unclear to what extent oculomotor behavior influences manual responses to social and nonsocial stimuli. In two experiments, we tracked the gaze of participants during the cueing task with nonpredictive gaze and arrow cues. In Experiment 1, the discrimination task was easy and eye movements were not necessary, whereas in Experiment 2 they were instrumental in identifying the target. Validity effects on manual response time (RT) were similar for the two cues in Experiment 1 and in Experiment 2, though in the presence of eye movements observers were overall slower to respond to the arrow cue compared with the gaze cue. Cue direction had an effect on saccadic performance before the discrimination was presented and throughout the duration of the trial. Furthermore, we found evidence of a distinct impact of the type of cue on diverse oculomotor components. While saccade latencies were affected by the type of cue, both before and after the target onset, saccade landing positions were not. Critically, the manual validity effect was predicted by the landing position of the initial eye movement. This work suggests that the relationship between eye movements and attention is not straightforward. In the presence of overt selection, saccade latency related to the overall speed of manual response, while eye movements landing position was closely related to manual performance in response to different cues.",
keywords = "Attention, Eye movements and visual attention, Face perception",
author = "Claudia Bonmassar and Francesco Pavani and {van Zoest}, Wieske",
year = "2019",
month = jul,
day = "15",
doi = "10.3758/s13414-019-01669-9",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "1236--1252",
journal = "Attention, perception & psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of eye movements in manual responses to social and nonsocial cues

AU - Bonmassar, Claudia

AU - Pavani, Francesco

AU - van Zoest, Wieske

PY - 2019/7/15

Y1 - 2019/7/15

N2 - Gaze and arrow cues cause covert attention shifts even when they are uninformative. Nonetheless, it is unclear to what extent oculomotor behavior influences manual responses to social and nonsocial stimuli. In two experiments, we tracked the gaze of participants during the cueing task with nonpredictive gaze and arrow cues. In Experiment 1, the discrimination task was easy and eye movements were not necessary, whereas in Experiment 2 they were instrumental in identifying the target. Validity effects on manual response time (RT) were similar for the two cues in Experiment 1 and in Experiment 2, though in the presence of eye movements observers were overall slower to respond to the arrow cue compared with the gaze cue. Cue direction had an effect on saccadic performance before the discrimination was presented and throughout the duration of the trial. Furthermore, we found evidence of a distinct impact of the type of cue on diverse oculomotor components. While saccade latencies were affected by the type of cue, both before and after the target onset, saccade landing positions were not. Critically, the manual validity effect was predicted by the landing position of the initial eye movement. This work suggests that the relationship between eye movements and attention is not straightforward. In the presence of overt selection, saccade latency related to the overall speed of manual response, while eye movements landing position was closely related to manual performance in response to different cues.

AB - Gaze and arrow cues cause covert attention shifts even when they are uninformative. Nonetheless, it is unclear to what extent oculomotor behavior influences manual responses to social and nonsocial stimuli. In two experiments, we tracked the gaze of participants during the cueing task with nonpredictive gaze and arrow cues. In Experiment 1, the discrimination task was easy and eye movements were not necessary, whereas in Experiment 2 they were instrumental in identifying the target. Validity effects on manual response time (RT) were similar for the two cues in Experiment 1 and in Experiment 2, though in the presence of eye movements observers were overall slower to respond to the arrow cue compared with the gaze cue. Cue direction had an effect on saccadic performance before the discrimination was presented and throughout the duration of the trial. Furthermore, we found evidence of a distinct impact of the type of cue on diverse oculomotor components. While saccade latencies were affected by the type of cue, both before and after the target onset, saccade landing positions were not. Critically, the manual validity effect was predicted by the landing position of the initial eye movement. This work suggests that the relationship between eye movements and attention is not straightforward. In the presence of overt selection, saccade latency related to the overall speed of manual response, while eye movements landing position was closely related to manual performance in response to different cues.

KW - Attention

KW - Eye movements and visual attention

KW - Face perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061279750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13414-019-01669-9

DO - 10.3758/s13414-019-01669-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85061279750

VL - 81

SP - 1236

EP - 1252

JO - Attention, perception & psychophysics

JF - Attention, perception & psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 5

ER -