"The only way I know how to live is to work": A qualitative study of work following treatment for prostate cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

"The only way I know how to live is to work" : A qualitative study of work following treatment for prostate cancer. / Grunfeld, Elizabeth A; Drudge-Coates, Lawrence; Rixon, Lorna; Eaton, Emma; Cooper, Alethea F.

In: Health Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2013, p. 75-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Grunfeld, Elizabeth A ; Drudge-Coates, Lawrence ; Rixon, Lorna ; Eaton, Emma ; Cooper, Alethea F. / "The only way I know how to live is to work" : A qualitative study of work following treatment for prostate cancer. In: Health Psychology. 2013 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 75-82.

Bibtex

@article{66217a21d29c4b3ebd6314cd3a167f37,
title = "{"}The only way I know how to live is to work{"}: A qualitative study of work following treatment for prostate cancer",
abstract = "Objective: For many survivors of prostate cancer, returning to work posttreatment is a realistic goal. However, little research to date has explored work among prostate cancer survivors. The focus of this study was to explore the meaning of work among prostate cancer survivors and to describe the linkages between masculinity and work following prostate cancer treatment. Method: Fifty prostate cancer survivors who were in paid employment prior to their diagnosis completed a semistructured interview following completion of their treatment and of these, 41 also completed a 12-month follow-up interview. Framework analysis of the 91 transcripts was undertaken. Results: The majority of the men had returned to work at the 12-month interview. Four themes were identified, and these were labeled {"}Work and self-identity,{"} {"}Work-related implications of treatment side effects,{"} {"}Disclosure of cancer,{"} and {"}Perceptions of future as a cancer survivor.{"} A degree of embarrassment and concern about residual side effects and whether these would present a challenge within the workplace was apparent among our sample and was compounded by a reluctance to disclose these. Conclusions: The descriptions provided by the men in this study reveal that the experience of prostate cancer can lead to challenges for both social and work-related roles. The influence of prostate cancer on men's reports of masculinity was variable, and recognition of these differences is required. In addition, some survivors of prostate cancer may require specific interventions aimed at helping them to manage disclosure of their illness, particularly within a work environment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).",
author = "Grunfeld, {Elizabeth A} and Lawrence Drudge-Coates and Lorna Rixon and Emma Eaton and Cooper, {Alethea F}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1037/a0030387",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "75--82",
journal = "Health Psychology",
issn = "0278-6133",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - "The only way I know how to live is to work"

T2 - A qualitative study of work following treatment for prostate cancer

AU - Grunfeld, Elizabeth A

AU - Drudge-Coates, Lawrence

AU - Rixon, Lorna

AU - Eaton, Emma

AU - Cooper, Alethea F

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Objective: For many survivors of prostate cancer, returning to work posttreatment is a realistic goal. However, little research to date has explored work among prostate cancer survivors. The focus of this study was to explore the meaning of work among prostate cancer survivors and to describe the linkages between masculinity and work following prostate cancer treatment. Method: Fifty prostate cancer survivors who were in paid employment prior to their diagnosis completed a semistructured interview following completion of their treatment and of these, 41 also completed a 12-month follow-up interview. Framework analysis of the 91 transcripts was undertaken. Results: The majority of the men had returned to work at the 12-month interview. Four themes were identified, and these were labeled "Work and self-identity," "Work-related implications of treatment side effects," "Disclosure of cancer," and "Perceptions of future as a cancer survivor." A degree of embarrassment and concern about residual side effects and whether these would present a challenge within the workplace was apparent among our sample and was compounded by a reluctance to disclose these. Conclusions: The descriptions provided by the men in this study reveal that the experience of prostate cancer can lead to challenges for both social and work-related roles. The influence of prostate cancer on men's reports of masculinity was variable, and recognition of these differences is required. In addition, some survivors of prostate cancer may require specific interventions aimed at helping them to manage disclosure of their illness, particularly within a work environment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Objective: For many survivors of prostate cancer, returning to work posttreatment is a realistic goal. However, little research to date has explored work among prostate cancer survivors. The focus of this study was to explore the meaning of work among prostate cancer survivors and to describe the linkages between masculinity and work following prostate cancer treatment. Method: Fifty prostate cancer survivors who were in paid employment prior to their diagnosis completed a semistructured interview following completion of their treatment and of these, 41 also completed a 12-month follow-up interview. Framework analysis of the 91 transcripts was undertaken. Results: The majority of the men had returned to work at the 12-month interview. Four themes were identified, and these were labeled "Work and self-identity," "Work-related implications of treatment side effects," "Disclosure of cancer," and "Perceptions of future as a cancer survivor." A degree of embarrassment and concern about residual side effects and whether these would present a challenge within the workplace was apparent among our sample and was compounded by a reluctance to disclose these. Conclusions: The descriptions provided by the men in this study reveal that the experience of prostate cancer can lead to challenges for both social and work-related roles. The influence of prostate cancer on men's reports of masculinity was variable, and recognition of these differences is required. In addition, some survivors of prostate cancer may require specific interventions aimed at helping them to manage disclosure of their illness, particularly within a work environment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).

U2 - 10.1037/a0030387

DO - 10.1037/a0030387

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 75

EP - 82

JO - Health Psychology

JF - Health Psychology

SN - 0278-6133

IS - 1

ER -