The myth of agency and patient choice in health care? The case of drug treatments to prevent coronary disease

Stirling Bryan, Paramjit Gill, Sheila Greenfield, K Gutridge, Tom Marshall

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    18 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Patient choice is at the heart of health-care reform programmes in the UK and in many other countries. The success of patient choice initiatives is dependent on a well-functioning agency relationship in health care. We interviewed 197 patients from 13 general practices in the West Midlands, UK, both before and after coronary screening. Our study suggests that, for patients presenting for coronary risk screening in primary care, the agency relationship is not working well--patients' expressed preferences relating to decisions to commence drug treatments were largely over-ridden in the clinical consultation. Therefore, if choice is to be a real driver of change in health care it needs to encompass patient empowerment and be based on a more collaborative approach to decision making between patients and professionals.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2698-2701
    Number of pages4
    JournalSocial Science & Medicine
    Volume63
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2006

    Keywords

    • coronary disease
    • agency relationship
    • drug treatments
    • choice
    • UK

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The myth of agency and patient choice in health care? The case of drug treatments to prevent coronary disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this