The influence of ingroup/outgroup categorization on same- and other-race face processing: The moderating role of inter- versus intra-racial context

Kevin Cassidy, Kimberly Quinn, Glyn Humphreys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated the impact of ingroup/outgroup categorization on the encoding of same-race and other-race faces presented in inter-racial and intra-racial contexts (Experiments 1 and 2, respectively). White participants performed a same/different matching task on pairs of upright and inverted faces that were either same-race (White) or other-race (Black), and labeled as being from the same university or a different university. In Experiment 1, the same- and other-race faces were intermixed. For other-race faces, participants demonstrated greater configural processing following same- than other-university labeling. Same-race faces showed strong configural coding irrespective of the university labeling. In Experiment 2, faces were blocked by race. Participants demonstrated greater configural processing of same- than other-university faces, but now for both same- and other-race faces. These results demonstrate that other-race face processing is sensitive to non-racial ingroup/outgroup status regardless of racial context, but that the sensitivity of same-race face processing to the same cues depends on the racial context in which targets are encountered. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)811-817
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume47
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2011

Keywords

  • Racial context
  • Inversion effects
  • Face processing
  • Configural processing
  • Ingroup/outgroup categorization
  • Other-race effect

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The influence of ingroup/outgroup categorization on same- and other-race face processing: The moderating role of inter- versus intra-racial context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this