The Inconveniences of Transnational Democracy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

The Inconveniences of Transnational Democracy. / Cabrera, Angel.

In: Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 21, No. 2, 01.06.2007, p. 219-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{aa540ba98d8944f2a852320070b7c787,
title = "The Inconveniences of Transnational Democracy",
abstract = "Despite some limited moves toward openness and accountability, suprastate policy formation in such bodies as the World Trade Organization remains fundamentally exclusive of individuals within states. This article critiques the “don{\textquoteright}t kill the goose” arguments commonly offered in defense of such exclusions. It highlights similarities between those arguments and past arguments for elitist forms of democracy, where strict limitations are advocated on the participation of nonelites in the name of allowing leaders to act most effectively in the broad public interest. Advocated here is movement toward a strongly empowered WTO parliamentary body that would be guided in practice by a principle of democratic symmetry, attempting to match input to the increasing impacts of WTO governance. A parliament with codecision powers broadly similar to those of the European Parliament is offered as a long-term institutional ideal.",
author = "Angel Cabrera",
year = "2007",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1747-7093.2007.00071.x",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "219--38",
journal = "Ethics & International Affairs",
issn = "0892-6794",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Inconveniences of Transnational Democracy

AU - Cabrera, Angel

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - Despite some limited moves toward openness and accountability, suprastate policy formation in such bodies as the World Trade Organization remains fundamentally exclusive of individuals within states. This article critiques the “don’t kill the goose” arguments commonly offered in defense of such exclusions. It highlights similarities between those arguments and past arguments for elitist forms of democracy, where strict limitations are advocated on the participation of nonelites in the name of allowing leaders to act most effectively in the broad public interest. Advocated here is movement toward a strongly empowered WTO parliamentary body that would be guided in practice by a principle of democratic symmetry, attempting to match input to the increasing impacts of WTO governance. A parliament with codecision powers broadly similar to those of the European Parliament is offered as a long-term institutional ideal.

AB - Despite some limited moves toward openness and accountability, suprastate policy formation in such bodies as the World Trade Organization remains fundamentally exclusive of individuals within states. This article critiques the “don’t kill the goose” arguments commonly offered in defense of such exclusions. It highlights similarities between those arguments and past arguments for elitist forms of democracy, where strict limitations are advocated on the participation of nonelites in the name of allowing leaders to act most effectively in the broad public interest. Advocated here is movement toward a strongly empowered WTO parliamentary body that would be guided in practice by a principle of democratic symmetry, attempting to match input to the increasing impacts of WTO governance. A parliament with codecision powers broadly similar to those of the European Parliament is offered as a long-term institutional ideal.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2007.00071.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2007.00071.x

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 219

EP - 238

JO - Ethics & International Affairs

JF - Ethics & International Affairs

SN - 0892-6794

IS - 2

ER -