The frequency and severity of extinction after stroke affecting different vascular territories

Magdalena Chechlacz, Pia Rotshtein, Nele Demeyere, Wai-Ling Bickerton, Glyn W Humphreys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined the frequency and severity of visual versus tactile extinction based on data from a large group of sub-acute patients (n=454) with strokes affecting different vascular territories. After right hemisphere damage visual and tactile extinction were equally common. However, after left hemisphere damage tactile extinction was more common than visual. The frequency of extinction was significantly higher in patients with right compared to left hemisphere damage in both visual and tactile modalities but this held only for strokes affecting the MCA and PCA territories and not for strokes affecting other vascular territories. Furthermore, the severity of extinction did not differ as a function of either the stimulus modality (visual versus tactile), the affected hemisphere (left versus right) or the stroke territory (MCA, PCA or other vascular territories). We conclude that the frequency but not severity of extinction in both modalities relates to the side of damage (i.e. left versus right hemisphere) and the vascular territories affected by the stroke, and that left hemisphere dominance for motor control may link to the greater incidence of tactile than visual extinction after left hemisphere stroke. We discuss the implications of our findings for understanding hemispheric lateralization within visuospatial attention networks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-17
Number of pages7
JournalNeuropsychologia
Volume54
Early online date27 Dec 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Keywords

  • Visual extinction
  • Tactile extinction
  • MCA
  • PCA
  • Stroke

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The frequency and severity of extinction after stroke affecting different vascular territories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this