The financial reporting of executive share options in the UK
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
This paper is based on a study into executive share option (ESO) schemes. It deals with the practical problems that need to be addressed when valuing and accounting for such options. In particular it makes a contribution to the debate as to whether the financial accounts can give a 'true and fair view' when the granting of an ESO is ignored in the accounting records of companies. The paper uses a case study to demonstrate how ESO could be valued and recorded in financial statements. The case is made for and against a number of possible treatments and we highlight the difficulty that exists in adequately dealing with this form of reward within the current accounting framework. The issue of the level of disclosure and the accouting treatment of share options awarded to directors of companies has recently been in the spotlight in the UK. The subject has been mentioned in both the Cadbury Report and the Greenbury Report, and there are recommendations on the appropriate treatment from the Urgent Issues Task Force. In the USA there are new SEC requirements on this matter, and the FASB has issued proposals on what it regards as the appropriate disclosure and accounting treatment of employee stock options (which includes options issued to directors and other executives). The FASB proposals of 1993 led to criticisms from politicians, the business community and professional accountants, and the proposals were modified in 1995.
|Number of pages||18|
|Journal||British Accounting Review|
|Publication status||Published - 1 Jan 1996|