The evolving construction and conceptualisation of ‘disability’ in Bhutan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{745ff640e09e4242abbcda431a05c39a,
title = "The evolving construction and conceptualisation of {\textquoteleft}disability{\textquoteright} in Bhutan",
abstract = "This study – a year-long ethnographic exploration of disability and education in Bhutan – finds that two dominant discourses around {\textquoteleft}disability{\textquoteright} are entering Bhutan simultaneously: the discourse of the medical model of disability and the discourse of the social or human rights model of disability. In this paper, I argue that these two discourses are especially exposed in the Bhutanese context to be opposing forces in shaping local conceptualisation and construction of {\textquoteleft}disability{\textquoteright}. By examining the Bhutan case, it can be seen that these kinds of disparate and contentious exogenous constructions of {\textquoteleft}disability{\textquoteright} occur everywhere in the world and negotiate with local constructions of {\textquoteleft}disability{\textquoteright} uneasily. Understanding the interactions of disability discourses in the Bhutanese context can help to understand the interactions of disability discourses writ large.",
author = "Matthew Schuelka",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/09687599.2015.1052043",
language = "English",
journal = "Disability & Society",
issn = "0968-7599",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evolving construction and conceptualisation of ‘disability’ in Bhutan

AU - Schuelka, Matthew

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This study – a year-long ethnographic exploration of disability and education in Bhutan – finds that two dominant discourses around ‘disability’ are entering Bhutan simultaneously: the discourse of the medical model of disability and the discourse of the social or human rights model of disability. In this paper, I argue that these two discourses are especially exposed in the Bhutanese context to be opposing forces in shaping local conceptualisation and construction of ‘disability’. By examining the Bhutan case, it can be seen that these kinds of disparate and contentious exogenous constructions of ‘disability’ occur everywhere in the world and negotiate with local constructions of ‘disability’ uneasily. Understanding the interactions of disability discourses in the Bhutanese context can help to understand the interactions of disability discourses writ large.

AB - This study – a year-long ethnographic exploration of disability and education in Bhutan – finds that two dominant discourses around ‘disability’ are entering Bhutan simultaneously: the discourse of the medical model of disability and the discourse of the social or human rights model of disability. In this paper, I argue that these two discourses are especially exposed in the Bhutanese context to be opposing forces in shaping local conceptualisation and construction of ‘disability’. By examining the Bhutan case, it can be seen that these kinds of disparate and contentious exogenous constructions of ‘disability’ occur everywhere in the world and negotiate with local constructions of ‘disability’ uneasily. Understanding the interactions of disability discourses in the Bhutanese context can help to understand the interactions of disability discourses writ large.

U2 - 10.1080/09687599.2015.1052043

DO - 10.1080/09687599.2015.1052043

M3 - Article

JO - Disability & Society

JF - Disability & Society

SN - 0968-7599

ER -