Taking life and liberty seriously: reconsidering criminal liability under Article 2 of the ECHR
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Colleges, School and Institutes
What is the relationship between the right to life and criminal liability, and what should it be, given the significance we rightly attribute both to human life and to human freedom? This article explores the circumstances in which the European Court of Human Rights imposes a positive obligation to criminalise and pursue criminal forms of redress, and concludes that the Court’s doctrine carries the potential of both coercive overreach and dilution of the right to life itself. These problems are compounded by opacity in the Court’s doctrine. I propose a way forward that takes both the right to life and human freedom seriously.
|Journal||Modern Law Review|
|Publication status||Published - 20 Nov 2017|
- human rights law, criminalisation, redress, right to life, Da Silva v UK, rule of law