Survival after traumatic brain injury improves with deployment of neurosurgeons: a comparison of US and UK military treatment facilities during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Authors

  • John Breeze
  • Douglas M Bowley
  • Stuart E Harrisson
  • Justin Dye
  • Christopher Neal
  • Randy S Bell
  • Rocco A Armonda
  • Jospeh DuBose
  • Rory F Rickard
  • David Bryan Powers

Colleges, School and Institutes

External organisations

  • Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK johno.breeze@gmail.com.
  • Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK.
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA.
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • National Capital Neurosurgery Consortium, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Surgical Research Laboratory, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
  • Center for the Sustainment of Trauma and Readiness Skills, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK. blanchrj@bham.ac.uk.
  • Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the most common cause of death on the modern battlefield. In recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, the US typically deployed neurosurgeons to medical treatment facilities (MTFs), while the UK did not. Our aim was to compare the incidence, TBI and treatment in US and UK-led military MTF to ascertain if differences in deployed trauma systems affected outcomes.

METHODS: The US and UK Combat Trauma Registries were scrutinised for patients with HI at deployed MTFs between March 2003 and October 2011. Registry datasets were adapted to stratify TBI using the Mayo Classification System for Traumatic Brain Injury Severity. An adjusted multiple logistic regression model was performed using fatality as the binomial dependent variable and treatment in a US-MTF or UK-MTF, surgical decompression, US military casualty and surgery performed by a neurosurgeon as independent variables.

RESULTS: 15 031 patients arrived alive at military MTF after TBI. Presence of a neurosurgeon was associated with increased odds of survival in casualties with moderate or severe TBI (p<0.0001, OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.34 to 4.73). High injury severity (Injury Severity Scores 25-75) was significantly associated with a lower survival (OR 4×104, 95% CI 1.61×104 to 110.6×104, p<0.001); however, having a neurosurgeon present still remained significantly positively associated with survival (OR 3.25, 95% CI 2.71 to 3.91, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Presence of neurosurgeons increased the likelihood of survival after TBI. We therefore recommend that the UK should deploy neurosurgeons to forward military MTF whenever possible in line with their US counterparts.

Bibliographic note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Details

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 7 Feb 2020