Subsequent donation requests among 2472 unrelated hematopoietic progenitor cell donors are associated with bone marrow harvest

Robert N Lown, Sameer Tulpule, Nigel H Russell, Charles F Craddock, Rochelle Roest, J Alejandro Madrigal, Bronwen E Shaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Approximately 1 in 20 unrelated donors are asked to make a second donation of hematopoietic progenitor cells, the majority for the same patient. Anthony Nolan undertook a study of subsequent hematopoietic progenitor cell donations made by its donors from 2005 to 2011, with the aims of predicting those donors more likely to be called for a second donation, assessing rates of serious adverse reactions and examining harvest yields. This was not a study of factors predictive of second allografts. During the study period 2591 donations were made, of which 120 (4.6%) were subsequent donations. The median time between donations was 179 days (range, 21-4016). Indications for a second allogeneic transplant included primary graft failure (11.7%), secondary graft failure (53.2%), relapse (30.6%) and others (1.8%). On multivariate analysis, bone marrow harvest at first donation was associated with subsequent donation requests (odds ratio 2.00, P=0.001). The rate of serious adverse reactions in donors making a subsequent donation appeared greater than the rate in those making a first donation (relative risk=3.29, P=0.005). Harvest yields per kilogram recipient body weight were equivalent between donations, although females appeared to have a lower yield at the subsequent donation. Knowledge of these factors will help unrelated donor registries to counsel their donors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1956-63
Number of pages8
JournalHaematologica
Volume98
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Subsequent donation requests among 2472 unrelated hematopoietic progenitor cell donors are associated with bone marrow harvest'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this