Spatial variation and inconsistency between estimates of onset of muscle activation from EMG and ultrasound
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Colleges, School and Institutes
- Pain Clinic, Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
- Laboratory of Engineering of the Neuromuscular System and Motor Rehabilitation, Department of Electronics, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Delayed onset of muscle activation can be a descriptor of impaired motor control. Activation onset can be estimated from electromyography (EMG)-registered muscle excitation and from ultrasound-registered muscle motion, which enables non-invasive measurements in deep muscles. However, in voluntary activation, EMG- and ultrasound-detected activation onsets may not correspond. To evaluate this, ten healthy men performed isometric elbow flexion at 20% to 70% of their maximal force. Utilising a multi-channel electrode transparent to ultrasound, EMG and M(otion)-mode ultrasound were recorded simultaneously over the biceps brachii muscle. The time intervals between automated and visually estimated activation onsets were correlated with the regional variation of EMG and muscle motion onset, contraction level and speed. Automated and visual onsets indicated variable time intervals between EMG- and motion onset, median (interquartile range) 96 (121) ms and 48 (72) ms, respectively. In 17% (computed analysis) or 23% (visual analysis) of trials, motion onset was detected before local EMG onset. Multi-channel EMG and M-mode ultrasound revealed regional differences in activation onset, which decreased with higher contraction speed (Spearman ρ ≥ 0.45, P < 0.001). In voluntary activation the heterogeneous motor unit recruitment together with immediate motion transmission may explain the high variation of the time intervals between local EMG- and ultrasound-detected activation onset.
|Number of pages||11|
|Publication status||Published - 8 Feb 2017|