Screening for bipolar spectrum disorders: a comprehensive meta-analysis of accuracy studies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Authors

  • André F. Carvalho
  • Paulo Marcelo G. Sales
  • Joanna K. Soczynska
  • Cristiano A. Köhler
  • Thiago H. Freitas
  • João Quevedo
  • Thomas N. Hyphantis
  • Roger S. Mcintyre
  • Eduard Vieta

Abstract

Background
Bipolar spectrum disorders are frequently under-recognized and/or misdiagnosed in various settings. Several influential publications recommend the routine screening of bipolar disorder. A systematic review and meta-analysis of accuracy studies for the bipolar spectrum diagnostic scale (BSDS), the hypomania checklist (HCL-32) and the mood disorder questionnaire (MDQ) were performed.
Methods
The Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane, PsycINFO and SCOPUS databases were searched. Studies were included if the accuracy properties of the screening measures were determined against a DSM or ICD-10 structured diagnostic interview. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to rate bias.
Results
Fifty three original studies met inclusion criteria (N=21,542). At recommended cutoffs, summary sensitivities were 81%, 66% and 69%, while specificities were 67%, 79% and 86% for the HCL-32, MDQ, and BSDS in psychiatric services, respectively. The HCL-32 was more accurate than the MDQ for the detection of type II bipolar disorder in mental health care centers (P=0.018). At a cutoff of 7, the MDQ had a summary sensitivity of 43% and a summary specificity of 95% for detection of bipolar disorder in primary care or general population settings.
Limitations
Most studies were performed in mental health care settings. Several included studies had a high risk of bias.
Conclusions
Although accuracy properties of the three screening instruments did not consistently differ in mental health care services, the HCL-32 was more accurate than the MDQ for the detection of type II BD. More studies in other settings (for example, in primary care) are necessary.

Bibliographic note

Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-346
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Affective Disorders
Volume172
Early online date23 Oct 2014
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2015

Keywords

  • Bipolar disorder, Screening, Accuracy studies, Systematic review, Meta-analysis