Revised criteria of International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS) for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Revised criteria of International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS) for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis. / Mochizuki, Manabu; Smith, Justine R.; Takase, Hiroshi; Kaburaki, Toshikatsu; Acharya, Nisha R.; Rao, Narsing A.

In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 103, No. 10, 2019, p. 1418-1422.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Mochizuki, Manabu ; Smith, Justine R. ; Takase, Hiroshi ; Kaburaki, Toshikatsu ; Acharya, Nisha R. ; Rao, Narsing A. / Revised criteria of International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS) for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis. In: British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2019 ; Vol. 103, No. 10. pp. 1418-1422.

Bibtex

@article{40d492fd41fa43478d231fcece6fe3bc,
title = "Revised criteria of International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS) for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis",
abstract = "Aims International criteria for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis (OS) was established by the first International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS) and validations studies revealed certain limitations of the criteria. To overcome the limitations, revised IWOS criteria was established in an international meeting. This manuscript was aimed at reporting the revised IWOS criteria. Methods A consensus workshop was carried out to discuss and revise the IWOS criteria. The workshop was held on 27 April 2017, in Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia. Prior to the workshop, a questionnaire proposing revised criteria and consisting of one item for differential diagnosis, seven items for ocular clinical signs, 10 items for systemic investigations and three categories of diagnostic criteria was circulated to 30 uveitis specialists. Questionnaire items with over 75% support were taken as consensus agreement; items with below 50% support were taken as consensus disagreement and items with 50%-75% support were discussed at the workshop. Of the latter items, those supported by two-thirds majority in the workshop were taken as consensus agreement. Results The survey and subsequent workshop reached consensus agreements of the revised criteria for the diagnosis of OS as follows: (1) other causes of granulomatous uveitis must be ruled out; (2) seven intraocular clinical signs suggestive of OS; (3) eight results of systemic investigations in suspected OS and (4) three categories of diagnostic criteria depending on biopsy results and combination of intraocular signs and results of systemic investigations. Conclusions Revised IWOS criteria were proposed by a consensus workshop.",
keywords = "inflammation",
author = "Manabu Mochizuki and Smith, {Justine R.} and Hiroshi Takase and Toshikatsu Kaburaki and Acharya, {Nisha R.} and Rao, {Narsing A.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} {\textcopyright} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313356",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "1418--1422",
journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0007-1161",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revised criteria of International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS) for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis

AU - Mochizuki, Manabu

AU - Smith, Justine R.

AU - Takase, Hiroshi

AU - Kaburaki, Toshikatsu

AU - Acharya, Nisha R.

AU - Rao, Narsing A.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Aims International criteria for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis (OS) was established by the first International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS) and validations studies revealed certain limitations of the criteria. To overcome the limitations, revised IWOS criteria was established in an international meeting. This manuscript was aimed at reporting the revised IWOS criteria. Methods A consensus workshop was carried out to discuss and revise the IWOS criteria. The workshop was held on 27 April 2017, in Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia. Prior to the workshop, a questionnaire proposing revised criteria and consisting of one item for differential diagnosis, seven items for ocular clinical signs, 10 items for systemic investigations and three categories of diagnostic criteria was circulated to 30 uveitis specialists. Questionnaire items with over 75% support were taken as consensus agreement; items with below 50% support were taken as consensus disagreement and items with 50%-75% support were discussed at the workshop. Of the latter items, those supported by two-thirds majority in the workshop were taken as consensus agreement. Results The survey and subsequent workshop reached consensus agreements of the revised criteria for the diagnosis of OS as follows: (1) other causes of granulomatous uveitis must be ruled out; (2) seven intraocular clinical signs suggestive of OS; (3) eight results of systemic investigations in suspected OS and (4) three categories of diagnostic criteria depending on biopsy results and combination of intraocular signs and results of systemic investigations. Conclusions Revised IWOS criteria were proposed by a consensus workshop.

AB - Aims International criteria for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis (OS) was established by the first International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS) and validations studies revealed certain limitations of the criteria. To overcome the limitations, revised IWOS criteria was established in an international meeting. This manuscript was aimed at reporting the revised IWOS criteria. Methods A consensus workshop was carried out to discuss and revise the IWOS criteria. The workshop was held on 27 April 2017, in Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia. Prior to the workshop, a questionnaire proposing revised criteria and consisting of one item for differential diagnosis, seven items for ocular clinical signs, 10 items for systemic investigations and three categories of diagnostic criteria was circulated to 30 uveitis specialists. Questionnaire items with over 75% support were taken as consensus agreement; items with below 50% support were taken as consensus disagreement and items with 50%-75% support were discussed at the workshop. Of the latter items, those supported by two-thirds majority in the workshop were taken as consensus agreement. Results The survey and subsequent workshop reached consensus agreements of the revised criteria for the diagnosis of OS as follows: (1) other causes of granulomatous uveitis must be ruled out; (2) seven intraocular clinical signs suggestive of OS; (3) eight results of systemic investigations in suspected OS and (4) three categories of diagnostic criteria depending on biopsy results and combination of intraocular signs and results of systemic investigations. Conclusions Revised IWOS criteria were proposed by a consensus workshop.

KW - inflammation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062085857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313356

DO - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313356

M3 - Article

C2 - 30798264

AN - SCOPUS:85062085857

VL - 103

SP - 1418

EP - 1422

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

IS - 10

ER -